I wrote this article in 2024. Since then, Pope Francis died on April 21, 2025 and was replaced by Pope Leo XIV. Does this change anything?
Yes. It makes everything more urgent.
In the article, I explained that Francis was the 111th pope. Pope Leo XIV is now the 112th pope. According to the Prophecy of St. Malachy, the 112th pope is "Petrus Romanus" - Peter the Roman - the FINAL pope who will reign during tribulations before Rome is destroyed and God judges his people.
We're not waiting for the final pope anymore. He just took office. Leo XIV is sitting in the Vatican right now as the pope Malachy predicted would be the last.
I'm sharing this older work because Lily wasn't around to proofread it and I forgot I'd mentioned the Jesuit/Malachy stuff that now needs this update. But those details aren't the main point anyway.
The main point is this: 70,000 people watched the sun break physics in 1917. The Catholic Church officially recognizes it happened. And they've spent over a century erasing it from history.
Why? What did those three children learn that's so dangerous the Church would rather bury their own miracle than reveal the prophecy?
That's what matters. The 112th pope just took his seat. The Third Secret remains hidden. And most Christians still don't know that 70,000 people watched God prove himself in 1917.
I think there’s an inconsistency here. You said earlier: “Pope number 111 is “Petrus Romanus.” Peter the Roman.
According to Malachy’s prophecy, this is not just another pope. This is the final pope. The last pontiff before the Church as we know it ends. The prophecy gives more detail about this final pope than any other” and then allude to the idea that Francis would have been the final pope.
I was surprised to hear that Francis, who was to be the last pope according to the prophecies, had died and a new pope had been installed. In my mind, this brings into question all of the prophecies concerning the popes.
From what I've read, some think the text may allow other popes between "the glory of the olive" and Petrus Romanus.
In the text, "In persecutione extrema S.R.E. sedebit" ("In the final persecution of the Holy Roman Church, there will sit) is a separate sentence & paragraph from "Petrus Romanus, qui pascet oves in multis tribulationibus..." ("Peter the Roman, who will pasture his sheep in many tribulations..."). This may allow for unnamed popes before Petrus Romanus.
No idea if that's the correct interpretation, but it is a possibility.
I was born in 1965 and grew up on the story of Fatima and the Miracle of the Sun… I think you are still kind of missing the point. Why would the Divine Maternal appear - not to the prelates and princes of the world, but to vulnerable little children? To urge them to “dress more modestly” or “say more rosaries” - so that they don’t burn in hell forever? I doubt it. I bet the “Woman clothed with the Sun” came to warn the institutions that use brute force to dominate, control and abuse little children and other vulnerables - the Catholic, Orthodox and fundamentalist churches in general - that if they don’t reveal their own secrets, coverups and FRAUDULENCY — they will reap their own destruction. The whole kingdom of Heaven is already within us, and “a little child will lead” us back home.
No, I didn’t ~ “children” includes little boys. Child-rapists are primarily attracted to children. They typically have a preference of age, not gender, but will target whoever is available. Inferring or claiming the problem in the Catholic Church is a “gay” infiltration problem is an obvious distraction from real facts and criminal forensics.
When you look this up on Google, Pope Francis was actually the 112th Pope according to the Prophecy of the Popes, which would make Pope Leo XIV Pope #113. However, something I have not seen anybody mention yet is this: if Pope Benedict XVI resigned from the papacy, does he count?
Also, according to the Vatican's official list, there have been a total of 266 popes in the history of the Catholic Church, starting with St. Peter.
There have also been "antipopes." An antipope is a person who claims the papacy in opposition to a legitimately elected pope. These claims typically arise from a schism or disagreement within the church, often due to political influence or doctrinal disputes. While the term can apply to any false claimant, it usually refers to those with a significant following, a portion of the College of Cardinals, or powerful secular backing.
Historical examples:
Hippolytus (c. 217–235): One of the earliest figures to be considered an antipope, promoted by rival ecclesiastical parties in Rome.
Clement VII (1378–1394): Elected by a group of cardinals who regretted their choice of Pope Urban VI, Clement VII re-established a papal court in Avignon, France, leading to the Great Western Schism.
Felix V (1439–1449): The last historical antipope, his reign was part of a larger schism that ultimately ended with his abdication.
Significance: The presence of antipopes has historically caused significant turmoil and division within the Catholic Church and across Europe, as people and political leaders were forced to choose between rival claimants.
In all my 60 years as a cradle Catholic, the “miracle of the sun” was never kept from me - but the stories of the Divine Maternal as Mary appearing to young children, (not only at Fatima, but La Salette and Lourdes) was filtered through an institution intent on keeping “the pontifical secret” intact ~ not releasing it ~ to set victims free. “Prophecies” are also a distraction from the victims of abuse. If the Catholic Church and other world authoritarian powers were forced to reveal their “secrets” (aka records of shuffling priests, the Epstein files, etc) and how all these powers are complicit with one another - not really enemies ~ abusive entities/world powers would lose their authority and control over the people, “commoners” would come together in love, and we would have the period of peace in the world described by the Woman of Peace and Empathy making Herself known to those suffering the most.
All in all, pretty solid recap of Fatima, with one glaring exception. While I can't speak directly to your personal experience, as a Catholic of traditionalist bent, I can say unequivocally that a majority of traditional Catholics are well aware of The Miracle of the Sun. And a solid number of those are aware of Fatima's 3rd Secret and the scandal surrounding it.
Most people who've studies it extensively say that the 3rd Secret speaks to apostasy within the church rising all the way to the top. This is why a sitting Pope would be loathe to reveal it -- it would undermine the very authority of The Church!
Bella Dodd was a high-level communist in the US, who later converted to Catholicism and testified before congress that the communists -- and more importantly the Satanic powers behind communism -- had put thousands of homosexual double-agents into the priesthood during the 1920s and '30s. The disinformation psy-op surrounding the photos are fruits of that infiltration and apostasy. Vatican II was another such fruit of that conspiracy. It took a generation or so, but they were able to take over enough leadership positions, especially within the seminaries, that they could hijack Vatican II to destroy the Traditional Latin Mass. If you want to dig into that, I suggest the book "The Plot Against the Church"
Another thread to follow is that of Malachi Martin -- a former Jesuit priest and Exorcist -- who wrote a book titled "Windswept House" back in 1995. It was fiction, but he claimed it was a Roman a Clef -- 99% truth, thinly veiled as fiction. And in that book, the Satanists who had infiltrated the Church were planning on forcing the retirement of a sitting Pope in order to put one of their own onto the Throne of Saint Peter.
I read the book in 1995 and it was, to my young and not-yet-red-pilled mind, "out there." Describing black masses taking place within Rome, child sacrifices in Protestant Churches in the US, and a world wide network of Satanists plotting a one world order and looking to subvert The Church as part of its plans. But the intervening decades have proven it true.
My point is that Anti-Pope Francis and the current Anti-Pope Prevost are NOT popes, and should not be read into "the other" Malachy's prophecy. Francis is, on the other hand, the fulfillment of the prophecy that Apostasy would rise all the way to the top of the Church and of Malachi Martin's revelation of conspiracy's plans to force the resignation of a sitting pope -- Benedict -- to put one of their own onto the Throne of Saint Peter. It is why Francis was such a public, unrepentant heretic.
It’s the “traditional” hierarchy that has covered up child abuse within the Catholic Church for centuries, the crime that cries out to God “for vengeance”.
That hierarchy is anything but "traditional." But, yes, the Freemasonic and Satanic infiltrators of The Church who climbed the ranks to become Bishops and Cardinals are indeed the ones who actively recruited pederasts, were pederasts themselves, and who covered up the abuses and exploitations of children.
Incorrect, that’s misinformation . The biggest shufflers of predator priests were its traditionalist priests and prelates throughout history, not nefarious “infiltrators” or the Freemasonic mystery initiates that threatened to reveal the church’s darkest secrets, and were of course scapegoated. The “Pontifical Secret” forbidding VICTIMS of abuse from revealing the crimes committed against them and the world-wide mass system of shuffling priests (no pun intended) wasn’t kept intact for all these centuries by “modernists” or “gay priests” but by a rigidly “orthodox” Catholic system and hierarchy. And for centuries there were only male alter servers, but where little girls were available (like in all girl Catholic schools) they too were equally targeted. I would suggest reading books by modern day survivors, and those based on criminal forensics, not further conspiracy theory and distraction propaganda put forth by the church.
Totally wrong. There was no widespread tolerance and cover-up of sexual abuse of minors until the early 20th century -- i.e., the time when communists were infiltrating the church with sexual deviants. This had not been going on for centuries. And the VAST majority of victims were adolescent boys. Yes, abuses occurred in previous centuries, but the phenomenon of widespread systematic abuse and coverup is modern.
If you have sources to show otherwise, please cite them.
Check out bishopaccountability.org or better yet, go to a survivors meeting of S.N.A.P. (Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests)and educate yourself on this issue. Though YOU might not be aware of it ~ traditional, rigid religious authoritarianism, not perceived “modernism” - is the ideal breeding ground for abuse and cover up. All real life survivors agree. From the beginning of canon law, there is evidence of a disproportionate problem with sexual immaturity/repressed healthy adult sexuality in priestly candidates, and the resultant pathologies visited upon innocents, most notably pedophilia, child abuse and it’s cover up. The REVEALING of it is modern. If someone is telling you oh look, most of the victims were “boys” therefore it must be a new “gay” or “modern” problem - that’s either an incredibly naive person or one that’s trying to DISTRACT you from real criminal forensics and the facts, and you should wonder why. Under Communism, up to 3 in 4 children were sexually abused - by their beloved “traditional” priests in the very traditional Catholic churches their parents sought refuge in during those times. Countless children committed suicide, because their parents and whole villages wouldn’t believe them. And as a survivor of “traditional” Latin Mass Catholicism in the United States, supposedly “safe” from those “communist infiltrators” - I and other women and children (including my relatives before me) personally suffered countless outrages that have yet to see the light of day. If traditional prelates were so “for” revealing abusers and protecting the victims, why did no pope before Pope Frances, finally release the Pontifical Secret, which forbade victims from telling or informing police???? (Surely this is what our Lady really requested). But that abuse was silent and deadly against little boys and girls. and taken for granted as a fact of life in your beloved institution for so many centuries, does not mean it didn’t exist or the brutal history didn’t occur. It’s still being covered up, particularly in traditionalist sects. No amount of finger pointing or scapegoating, calling those promoting open windows and transparency the “devil” , can keep little children safe.
Canon law literally shows a problem with child abuse from the very inception of canon law. And the articles in bishopaccountability.org and survivor accounts plus forensics we have in modern times, echo that the reality existed, before the press got ahold of it. That none of the survivors are alive from prior to the twentieth century to tell their tale personally to you cannot negate your institutions’ exploitive history. These are real human beings whose lives were ruined. Try to invalidate them and you are denying the suffering Christ. And where Catholic priests and other authoritative hierarchies of men have a disproportionate amount of predators in their ranks, freemasonic organizations have a disproportionate amount of criminal investigators and disproportionately donate to charities helping the abused and protecting women and children. It only makes sense that the Catholic religious institution, criminally complicit in child abuse and its cover up, would point its fingers at those very persons trying to, and capable of exposing them.
Finally, not denying the existence of abuse. I'm stating that there was no widespread, systematic abuse prior to 20th century. Again, if you know of evidence of that, I'm willing to look at it.
My apologies - it was as early as the Didache (prior to Canon Law ) which addressed abuse of minors and the abortions priestly candidates were compelling to hide their immoral lifestyle. And the perpetuation of laws protecting the church rather than victims is what I was referring to in canon law. https://lawecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1182&context=clrj
It kind of irks me knowing I have put in 1000’s of hours of work on this platform in the last 3 years only to watch what I have built get set on the backburner so some fake tit, collagen lip implanted ‘influencer model’ can post to her Twitter feed that she is now on Substack and 10,000 idiots flood over here and boost her metrics so high that she is now number 1 in her niche after 2 entire days on the platform. They are not rewarding good writing. They are rewarding people that can generate a profit for Substack. I knew this was going to happen soon as it was announced they had gotten venture capital funding.
I couldn't agree more. Substack is like too many "so called" free speech venues that say claim one thing but do the opposite. It really is about money and agendas.
Why post Catholic stuff at all? The Catholic Church does not preach full biblical NT truth. They suppress truth. “Ye must be born again” is still the benchmark for true scriptural salvation. “Mary pondered all these things in her heart” indicates Mary was a sinner like all men who needed salvation through the atonement of Jesus on the cross. The muddy field sun event a hundred years ago can be easily dismissed as a lying sign and wonder (2 Thess 2:9-12). I’m confused that the pope and the Catholic Church has any point of discussion in any true Christian thread as anyone who has been truly born again has The Witness in them that the Catholic religion is too filled with error to be considered as any authority of scripture especially as we head closer and closer into end times and the Tribulation spoken of in The Revelation. The Spirit gives witness that we are children of God. (Romans 8:16). Anything else is man made religion pure and simple and only worth discussing to prove the Bible as the final authority. Ye must be born again. (John 3:7). Not water baptized as a child. Not a member of this or that church. Not one who adheres to religious dogma or traditions of men. Not a “good” person. Simply Born Again by believing and confessing that Jesus is Lord and that He died on the cross and was raised from the dead. (Romans 10:9-10). And as a followup to what has happened internally, water baptized (as a believer not as an infant) as an outward testimony of one’s new heart condition of born again-ness. And as a followup filled with the Spirit with the evidence of speaking in other tongues. (Acts 19:1-5). These three steps are the beginning of a biblical Christian believers walk. Anything other than this 1-2-3 is man made religion. This is the timeless Good News Gospel message. Merry CHRISTmas. Emmanuel God with us! 😀
Your assessment of TWW’s article is, in my humble opinion, spot on! Yes, the Sun dancing around IS a lying wonder… a show put on by a demonic spirit. Why?? To verify the other lying spirit that showed up and spoke to these children to begin with. That spirit WAS NOT Mary… it was a demonic spirit pretending to be her in order to keep the Catholic heresy going. This “church” is the world’s largest cult. Brainwashed since birth they follow one antichrist of a man and put his words on par, or exceeding, the written Word. Scriptura Solo… only scripture… is what I live by. Use discernment and don’t be deceived folks!
BTW, Wise Wolf, you’re being buried on purpose as the powers that be don’t like your message. Christianity is under attack worldwide. If you were a Joel Osteen or Rick Warren the world would beat feet to your door to hear your watered down feel good message. Keep punching!
If the Catholic Church was really a safeguarder of Jesus’ teachings, it wouldn’t have an “unbroken” pattern of covering up organized criminal activity against little children (and other vulnerables). and the historic shuffling of predator priests, all over the world (in conjunction with other religious and political entities implicated), while claiming to be pro life. Maybe the “secret” the Divine Maternal (manifesting to little children as “Mary”) asked the Catholic Church to release - was The “Pontifical Secret” ~ which “bound” little children and their families from revealing THEIR sexual abuse by priests - under penalty of “them” going to hell - if they told!!! The Catholic Church has been a leader among “religious” and political entities covering up its crimes against humanity, and probably has greater evidence of world wide corruption among political figures than can be found in the Epstein files.
Actually, it does Nick. The material/institutional church IS made up of fallible men, which means it IS a fallible system. It’s even written into canon law that anyone with the capacity to harm children, or who covers up/perpetuates the harming of children, is not a valid priest (or bishop or pope) their very ordination having been invalid. How many centuries of popes (and prelates) before Pope Francis refused to lift the Pontifical Secret (that forbade victims of abuse from telling and warning about their priest predators? )How many “traditional” Popes and prelates just followed the “tradition” of shuffling credibly accused priests - to “avoid scandal”? Psycho-sexual immaturity (which is what really leads to pedophilia) is one of the number one invalidating impediments to ordination, and the “scandal” this institution would like to avoid is its own fraudulency. That’s why it tries to distract you with vilification of gays and propaganda about imagined “infiltrators”. If you really believe in what your religion teaches (according to canon law)there really is NO unbroken priestly “powers” or ordinations magically conveyed through men’s rituals and hands in “apostolic succession” because the whole institution is complicit. This is why spiritually healthy people have left it in “mass” droves (no pun intended.) The real Church is not your glorified mortal prelates and princes. The real Church is the Invisible (Mystical) Body of Christ, the Union of all Souls, but particularly those innocent sacrificed victims who most emulate the suffering Christ - that your worldly institution has for so many centuries “infallibly” decided to throw under the bus. I bet the little children at Fatima (like at Lourdes and LaSalette) knew this secret, which is why they were managed, cloistered away or their story retold by the very entities culpable of hiding the truth.
Speaking in tongues is not the only sign of having received the Spirit. Any denomination, cult, ism, or individual congregation that REQUIRES speaking in tongues as proof of salvation is FALSE, because Paul says plainly that not all speak in tongues, and also that there are many spiritual gifts, and that tongues are not the greatest spiritual gift. You should clarify your response.
Ye Must Be Born Again. (John 3:3-7) Catholicism is a dead religion. Maybe God will shine a light again and a new charismatic renewal will flourish in the Catholic Church again. Or maybe it will simply fold itself into the false prophet realm of the Antichrist. When I was young I was been attacked twice by demons (blacking out in both instances) in a Catholic Church when I sought to pray to my Heavenly Father vs seek absolution by a priest in a confessional booth. I cannot expect one to understand unless the falsehood of the Catholic Church doctrine unless they are Born Again which starts a personal relationship with God The Father, The Lord Jesus Christ The Son, and The Holy Spirit. Once this occurs religious things like lent and confession to men and candles and baby baptism and priests etc etc etc become clear, especially with reading of The Word and especially the New Testament. Jesus commanded us to call no man on earth Father. (Matt 23:9) And what does the Catholic Church call every priest? The Catholic Church believes that the priest in his mystical position somehow turns a wafer into the literal body of Christ during the communion rite. (transubstantiation). We are instructed to break bread as believers and take communion in remembrance of what Christ did for us (1 Cor 11:25 & Luke 22:19) not in belief that somehow bread turns into something other than that. There is so much that tries to establish religious protocol in place of personal (biblical) faith that the Catholic Church can simply not be considered a true Christian (biblical) Church. But I digress. Read the New Testament and see what it says about faith vs religion. Religion always suffocates and kills, but The Spirit gives life. (John 6:63 & 2 Cor 3:6).
🙄 You didn’t hear one point of what I said. Read your Bible and trust in Jesus alone to save not a dead man-made religion that considers the Pope infallible. What hullabaloo. Ye must be born again. Once you are born of the Spirit you will understand. Over and out.
Maybe the phenomenon that "broke reality" also refused to be photographed because you know, God... he works in mysterious ways. Maybe what was seen was meant to be seen by human eyes only. Maybe Faith is why.
The Vatican, under pressure because all of the apparent photographers present didn't have a photo because the miracle would not be recorded decided to float a fake picture to buy more belief in the miracle.
Re:Fatima: LA Marzulli has done extensive published research into the phenomena and characterized it as an ‘encounter of the third kind’ and the ‘miracle of the sun’ as a UFO.
One of the most comprehensible and interesting articles I ever read about Fatima. It’s a very long read examining Fatima and its history leading up to this most turbulent time period we all currently exist within today. Is Pope Leo the last pope overseeing the end times which might just be playing out in real time before all of us today?
We need to all ask God for discernment in navigating this dangerous landscape we are forced to exist within. Stay aware, stay informed and listen to your heart and keep your soul a priority.
Jesus warned us about deception the most in the bible. At no other time in human history has deception played such a large role in society. With the advent of technology and AI it’s becoming so hard to distinguish fact from fiction. I don’t think God will tolerate this world of illusion much longer.
Are we part of the generation of the book of revelation which will witness the return of Christ?
I would like to add a comment to what you wrote. You mentioned discernment which is no small gift God has given His children. I want to elaborate and add the words spiritual discernment. Gods Word encourages us to be sober and be vigilant because our adversary the devil roams like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour. I believe the level of spiritual warfare going on around us even today is more than our little pea brains can fathom. It’s so important for each of us to suit up in the armor He has given us not only for defense against the wiles of the enemy, but also for offense. We don’t have to sit back in our rocking chairs and be passive in this battle, but have the Sword of the Spirit, the Word of God, and we are able to bring the battle to our enemy. Well those are my thoughts on the subject. I love each of you and love reading the articles and the comments from my brothers in arms.
The power hierarchy of the Catholic Church have always used it as a vehicle to express dominion over the people and to serve dark interests.
Yet despite this, the same Church has provided a structure for those who aspired for divine revelation and connection with the divine reality spoken of by the one known as Jesus.
A bit like the black and white tiled pattern in a masonic temple - giving you a choice to stand on a tile that you identify with.
I wrote this article in 2024. Since then, Pope Francis died on April 21, 2025 and was replaced by Pope Leo XIV. Does this change anything?
Yes. It makes everything more urgent.
In the article, I explained that Francis was the 111th pope. Pope Leo XIV is now the 112th pope. According to the Prophecy of St. Malachy, the 112th pope is "Petrus Romanus" - Peter the Roman - the FINAL pope who will reign during tribulations before Rome is destroyed and God judges his people.
We're not waiting for the final pope anymore. He just took office. Leo XIV is sitting in the Vatican right now as the pope Malachy predicted would be the last.
I'm sharing this older work because Lily wasn't around to proofread it and I forgot I'd mentioned the Jesuit/Malachy stuff that now needs this update. But those details aren't the main point anyway.
The main point is this: 70,000 people watched the sun break physics in 1917. The Catholic Church officially recognizes it happened. And they've spent over a century erasing it from history.
Why? What did those three children learn that's so dangerous the Church would rather bury their own miracle than reveal the prophecy?
That's what matters. The 112th pope just took his seat. The Third Secret remains hidden. And most Christians still don't know that 70,000 people watched God prove himself in 1917.
I think there’s an inconsistency here. You said earlier: “Pope number 111 is “Petrus Romanus.” Peter the Roman.
According to Malachy’s prophecy, this is not just another pope. This is the final pope. The last pontiff before the Church as we know it ends. The prophecy gives more detail about this final pope than any other” and then allude to the idea that Francis would have been the final pope.
I was surprised to hear that Francis, who was to be the last pope according to the prophecies, had died and a new pope had been installed. In my mind, this brings into question all of the prophecies concerning the popes.
And Bergoglio was Roman, the family did move to Argentina.
From what I've read, some think the text may allow other popes between "the glory of the olive" and Petrus Romanus.
In the text, "In persecutione extrema S.R.E. sedebit" ("In the final persecution of the Holy Roman Church, there will sit) is a separate sentence & paragraph from "Petrus Romanus, qui pascet oves in multis tribulationibus..." ("Peter the Roman, who will pasture his sheep in many tribulations..."). This may allow for unnamed popes before Petrus Romanus.
No idea if that's the correct interpretation, but it is a possibility.
I was born in 1965 and grew up on the story of Fatima and the Miracle of the Sun… I think you are still kind of missing the point. Why would the Divine Maternal appear - not to the prelates and princes of the world, but to vulnerable little children? To urge them to “dress more modestly” or “say more rosaries” - so that they don’t burn in hell forever? I doubt it. I bet the “Woman clothed with the Sun” came to warn the institutions that use brute force to dominate, control and abuse little children and other vulnerables - the Catholic, Orthodox and fundamentalist churches in general - that if they don’t reveal their own secrets, coverups and FRAUDULENCY — they will reap their own destruction. The whole kingdom of Heaven is already within us, and “a little child will lead” us back home.
I think you left out the notorious priests who were abusing little BOY S @ Judy Grubinski
No, I didn’t ~ “children” includes little boys. Child-rapists are primarily attracted to children. They typically have a preference of age, not gender, but will target whoever is available. Inferring or claiming the problem in the Catholic Church is a “gay” infiltration problem is an obvious distraction from real facts and criminal forensics.
When you look this up on Google, Pope Francis was actually the 112th Pope according to the Prophecy of the Popes, which would make Pope Leo XIV Pope #113. However, something I have not seen anybody mention yet is this: if Pope Benedict XVI resigned from the papacy, does he count?
Also, according to the Vatican's official list, there have been a total of 266 popes in the history of the Catholic Church, starting with St. Peter.
There have also been "antipopes." An antipope is a person who claims the papacy in opposition to a legitimately elected pope. These claims typically arise from a schism or disagreement within the church, often due to political influence or doctrinal disputes. While the term can apply to any false claimant, it usually refers to those with a significant following, a portion of the College of Cardinals, or powerful secular backing.
Historical examples:
Hippolytus (c. 217–235): One of the earliest figures to be considered an antipope, promoted by rival ecclesiastical parties in Rome.
Clement VII (1378–1394): Elected by a group of cardinals who regretted their choice of Pope Urban VI, Clement VII re-established a papal court in Avignon, France, leading to the Great Western Schism.
Felix V (1439–1449): The last historical antipope, his reign was part of a larger schism that ultimately ended with his abdication.
Significance: The presence of antipopes has historically caused significant turmoil and division within the Catholic Church and across Europe, as people and political leaders were forced to choose between rival claimants.
How do these figure in to the prophecy?
In all my 60 years as a cradle Catholic, the “miracle of the sun” was never kept from me - but the stories of the Divine Maternal as Mary appearing to young children, (not only at Fatima, but La Salette and Lourdes) was filtered through an institution intent on keeping “the pontifical secret” intact ~ not releasing it ~ to set victims free. “Prophecies” are also a distraction from the victims of abuse. If the Catholic Church and other world authoritarian powers were forced to reveal their “secrets” (aka records of shuffling priests, the Epstein files, etc) and how all these powers are complicit with one another - not really enemies ~ abusive entities/world powers would lose their authority and control over the people, “commoners” would come together in love, and we would have the period of peace in the world described by the Woman of Peace and Empathy making Herself known to those suffering the most.
All in all, pretty solid recap of Fatima, with one glaring exception. While I can't speak directly to your personal experience, as a Catholic of traditionalist bent, I can say unequivocally that a majority of traditional Catholics are well aware of The Miracle of the Sun. And a solid number of those are aware of Fatima's 3rd Secret and the scandal surrounding it.
Most people who've studies it extensively say that the 3rd Secret speaks to apostasy within the church rising all the way to the top. This is why a sitting Pope would be loathe to reveal it -- it would undermine the very authority of The Church!
Bella Dodd was a high-level communist in the US, who later converted to Catholicism and testified before congress that the communists -- and more importantly the Satanic powers behind communism -- had put thousands of homosexual double-agents into the priesthood during the 1920s and '30s. The disinformation psy-op surrounding the photos are fruits of that infiltration and apostasy. Vatican II was another such fruit of that conspiracy. It took a generation or so, but they were able to take over enough leadership positions, especially within the seminaries, that they could hijack Vatican II to destroy the Traditional Latin Mass. If you want to dig into that, I suggest the book "The Plot Against the Church"
Another thread to follow is that of Malachi Martin -- a former Jesuit priest and Exorcist -- who wrote a book titled "Windswept House" back in 1995. It was fiction, but he claimed it was a Roman a Clef -- 99% truth, thinly veiled as fiction. And in that book, the Satanists who had infiltrated the Church were planning on forcing the retirement of a sitting Pope in order to put one of their own onto the Throne of Saint Peter.
I read the book in 1995 and it was, to my young and not-yet-red-pilled mind, "out there." Describing black masses taking place within Rome, child sacrifices in Protestant Churches in the US, and a world wide network of Satanists plotting a one world order and looking to subvert The Church as part of its plans. But the intervening decades have proven it true.
My point is that Anti-Pope Francis and the current Anti-Pope Prevost are NOT popes, and should not be read into "the other" Malachy's prophecy. Francis is, on the other hand, the fulfillment of the prophecy that Apostasy would rise all the way to the top of the Church and of Malachi Martin's revelation of conspiracy's plans to force the resignation of a sitting pope -- Benedict -- to put one of their own onto the Throne of Saint Peter. It is why Francis was such a public, unrepentant heretic.
Anyway, thanks for the article. Great stuff.
It’s the “traditional” hierarchy that has covered up child abuse within the Catholic Church for centuries, the crime that cries out to God “for vengeance”.
That hierarchy is anything but "traditional." But, yes, the Freemasonic and Satanic infiltrators of The Church who climbed the ranks to become Bishops and Cardinals are indeed the ones who actively recruited pederasts, were pederasts themselves, and who covered up the abuses and exploitations of children.
Incorrect, that’s misinformation . The biggest shufflers of predator priests were its traditionalist priests and prelates throughout history, not nefarious “infiltrators” or the Freemasonic mystery initiates that threatened to reveal the church’s darkest secrets, and were of course scapegoated. The “Pontifical Secret” forbidding VICTIMS of abuse from revealing the crimes committed against them and the world-wide mass system of shuffling priests (no pun intended) wasn’t kept intact for all these centuries by “modernists” or “gay priests” but by a rigidly “orthodox” Catholic system and hierarchy. And for centuries there were only male alter servers, but where little girls were available (like in all girl Catholic schools) they too were equally targeted. I would suggest reading books by modern day survivors, and those based on criminal forensics, not further conspiracy theory and distraction propaganda put forth by the church.
Totally wrong. There was no widespread tolerance and cover-up of sexual abuse of minors until the early 20th century -- i.e., the time when communists were infiltrating the church with sexual deviants. This had not been going on for centuries. And the VAST majority of victims were adolescent boys. Yes, abuses occurred in previous centuries, but the phenomenon of widespread systematic abuse and coverup is modern.
If you have sources to show otherwise, please cite them.
Check out bishopaccountability.org or better yet, go to a survivors meeting of S.N.A.P. (Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests)and educate yourself on this issue. Though YOU might not be aware of it ~ traditional, rigid religious authoritarianism, not perceived “modernism” - is the ideal breeding ground for abuse and cover up. All real life survivors agree. From the beginning of canon law, there is evidence of a disproportionate problem with sexual immaturity/repressed healthy adult sexuality in priestly candidates, and the resultant pathologies visited upon innocents, most notably pedophilia, child abuse and it’s cover up. The REVEALING of it is modern. If someone is telling you oh look, most of the victims were “boys” therefore it must be a new “gay” or “modern” problem - that’s either an incredibly naive person or one that’s trying to DISTRACT you from real criminal forensics and the facts, and you should wonder why. Under Communism, up to 3 in 4 children were sexually abused - by their beloved “traditional” priests in the very traditional Catholic churches their parents sought refuge in during those times. Countless children committed suicide, because their parents and whole villages wouldn’t believe them. And as a survivor of “traditional” Latin Mass Catholicism in the United States, supposedly “safe” from those “communist infiltrators” - I and other women and children (including my relatives before me) personally suffered countless outrages that have yet to see the light of day. If traditional prelates were so “for” revealing abusers and protecting the victims, why did no pope before Pope Frances, finally release the Pontifical Secret, which forbade victims from telling or informing police???? (Surely this is what our Lady really requested). But that abuse was silent and deadly against little boys and girls. and taken for granted as a fact of life in your beloved institution for so many centuries, does not mean it didn’t exist or the brutal history didn’t occur. It’s still being covered up, particularly in traditionalist sects. No amount of finger pointing or scapegoating, calling those promoting open windows and transparency the “devil” , can keep little children safe.
None of that is showing abuse happening prior to the 20th century.
Canon law literally shows a problem with child abuse from the very inception of canon law. And the articles in bishopaccountability.org and survivor accounts plus forensics we have in modern times, echo that the reality existed, before the press got ahold of it. That none of the survivors are alive from prior to the twentieth century to tell their tale personally to you cannot negate your institutions’ exploitive history. These are real human beings whose lives were ruined. Try to invalidate them and you are denying the suffering Christ. And where Catholic priests and other authoritative hierarchies of men have a disproportionate amount of predators in their ranks, freemasonic organizations have a disproportionate amount of criminal investigators and disproportionately donate to charities helping the abused and protecting women and children. It only makes sense that the Catholic religious institution, criminally complicit in child abuse and its cover up, would point its fingers at those very persons trying to, and capable of exposing them.
Judy,
Getting an error at the link you provided.
Also, what part of canon law are you citing?
Finally, not denying the existence of abuse. I'm stating that there was no widespread, systematic abuse prior to 20th century. Again, if you know of evidence of that, I'm willing to look at it.
My apologies - it was as early as the Didache (prior to Canon Law ) which addressed abuse of minors and the abortions priestly candidates were compelling to hide their immoral lifestyle. And the perpetuation of laws protecting the church rather than victims is what I was referring to in canon law. https://lawecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1182&context=clrj
Yeah I too have noticed the influx of not only celebrities but politicians on here as well.... crazy!
Just keep going.
xoxox
MM
It kind of irks me knowing I have put in 1000’s of hours of work on this platform in the last 3 years only to watch what I have built get set on the backburner so some fake tit, collagen lip implanted ‘influencer model’ can post to her Twitter feed that she is now on Substack and 10,000 idiots flood over here and boost her metrics so high that she is now number 1 in her niche after 2 entire days on the platform. They are not rewarding good writing. They are rewarding people that can generate a profit for Substack. I knew this was going to happen soon as it was announced they had gotten venture capital funding.
I’m so sorry to hear!
=( GRRR , unfair.
Those celebs and politicians have plenty of money already right??? ..
Just don’t give up!! EVER.
💫🧙🏻♀️🔮🪄
I couldn't agree more. Substack is like too many "so called" free speech venues that say claim one thing but do the opposite. It really is about money and agendas.
Why post Catholic stuff at all? The Catholic Church does not preach full biblical NT truth. They suppress truth. “Ye must be born again” is still the benchmark for true scriptural salvation. “Mary pondered all these things in her heart” indicates Mary was a sinner like all men who needed salvation through the atonement of Jesus on the cross. The muddy field sun event a hundred years ago can be easily dismissed as a lying sign and wonder (2 Thess 2:9-12). I’m confused that the pope and the Catholic Church has any point of discussion in any true Christian thread as anyone who has been truly born again has The Witness in them that the Catholic religion is too filled with error to be considered as any authority of scripture especially as we head closer and closer into end times and the Tribulation spoken of in The Revelation. The Spirit gives witness that we are children of God. (Romans 8:16). Anything else is man made religion pure and simple and only worth discussing to prove the Bible as the final authority. Ye must be born again. (John 3:7). Not water baptized as a child. Not a member of this or that church. Not one who adheres to religious dogma or traditions of men. Not a “good” person. Simply Born Again by believing and confessing that Jesus is Lord and that He died on the cross and was raised from the dead. (Romans 10:9-10). And as a followup to what has happened internally, water baptized (as a believer not as an infant) as an outward testimony of one’s new heart condition of born again-ness. And as a followup filled with the Spirit with the evidence of speaking in other tongues. (Acts 19:1-5). These three steps are the beginning of a biblical Christian believers walk. Anything other than this 1-2-3 is man made religion. This is the timeless Good News Gospel message. Merry CHRISTmas. Emmanuel God with us! 😀
Your assessment of TWW’s article is, in my humble opinion, spot on! Yes, the Sun dancing around IS a lying wonder… a show put on by a demonic spirit. Why?? To verify the other lying spirit that showed up and spoke to these children to begin with. That spirit WAS NOT Mary… it was a demonic spirit pretending to be her in order to keep the Catholic heresy going. This “church” is the world’s largest cult. Brainwashed since birth they follow one antichrist of a man and put his words on par, or exceeding, the written Word. Scriptura Solo… only scripture… is what I live by. Use discernment and don’t be deceived folks!
BTW, Wise Wolf, you’re being buried on purpose as the powers that be don’t like your message. Christianity is under attack worldwide. If you were a Joel Osteen or Rick Warren the world would beat feet to your door to hear your watered down feel good message. Keep punching!
If the Catholic Church was really a safeguarder of Jesus’ teachings, it wouldn’t have an “unbroken” pattern of covering up organized criminal activity against little children (and other vulnerables). and the historic shuffling of predator priests, all over the world (in conjunction with other religious and political entities implicated), while claiming to be pro life. Maybe the “secret” the Divine Maternal (manifesting to little children as “Mary”) asked the Catholic Church to release - was The “Pontifical Secret” ~ which “bound” little children and their families from revealing THEIR sexual abuse by priests - under penalty of “them” going to hell - if they told!!! The Catholic Church has been a leader among “religious” and political entities covering up its crimes against humanity, and probably has greater evidence of world wide corruption among political figures than can be found in the Epstein files.
Actually, it does Nick. The material/institutional church IS made up of fallible men, which means it IS a fallible system. It’s even written into canon law that anyone with the capacity to harm children, or who covers up/perpetuates the harming of children, is not a valid priest (or bishop or pope) their very ordination having been invalid. How many centuries of popes (and prelates) before Pope Francis refused to lift the Pontifical Secret (that forbade victims of abuse from telling and warning about their priest predators? )How many “traditional” Popes and prelates just followed the “tradition” of shuffling credibly accused priests - to “avoid scandal”? Psycho-sexual immaturity (which is what really leads to pedophilia) is one of the number one invalidating impediments to ordination, and the “scandal” this institution would like to avoid is its own fraudulency. That’s why it tries to distract you with vilification of gays and propaganda about imagined “infiltrators”. If you really believe in what your religion teaches (according to canon law)there really is NO unbroken priestly “powers” or ordinations magically conveyed through men’s rituals and hands in “apostolic succession” because the whole institution is complicit. This is why spiritually healthy people have left it in “mass” droves (no pun intended.) The real Church is not your glorified mortal prelates and princes. The real Church is the Invisible (Mystical) Body of Christ, the Union of all Souls, but particularly those innocent sacrificed victims who most emulate the suffering Christ - that your worldly institution has for so many centuries “infallibly” decided to throw under the bus. I bet the little children at Fatima (like at Lourdes and LaSalette) knew this secret, which is why they were managed, cloistered away or their story retold by the very entities culpable of hiding the truth.
Come now….those “ other tongues “ you reference do not equal the babble coming from the mouths of evangelical Zionist Protestant’s .
Something truly embarrassing to witness.
Speaking in tongues is not the only sign of having received the Spirit. Any denomination, cult, ism, or individual congregation that REQUIRES speaking in tongues as proof of salvation is FALSE, because Paul says plainly that not all speak in tongues, and also that there are many spiritual gifts, and that tongues are not the greatest spiritual gift. You should clarify your response.
Ye Must Be Born Again. (John 3:3-7) Catholicism is a dead religion. Maybe God will shine a light again and a new charismatic renewal will flourish in the Catholic Church again. Or maybe it will simply fold itself into the false prophet realm of the Antichrist. When I was young I was been attacked twice by demons (blacking out in both instances) in a Catholic Church when I sought to pray to my Heavenly Father vs seek absolution by a priest in a confessional booth. I cannot expect one to understand unless the falsehood of the Catholic Church doctrine unless they are Born Again which starts a personal relationship with God The Father, The Lord Jesus Christ The Son, and The Holy Spirit. Once this occurs religious things like lent and confession to men and candles and baby baptism and priests etc etc etc become clear, especially with reading of The Word and especially the New Testament. Jesus commanded us to call no man on earth Father. (Matt 23:9) And what does the Catholic Church call every priest? The Catholic Church believes that the priest in his mystical position somehow turns a wafer into the literal body of Christ during the communion rite. (transubstantiation). We are instructed to break bread as believers and take communion in remembrance of what Christ did for us (1 Cor 11:25 & Luke 22:19) not in belief that somehow bread turns into something other than that. There is so much that tries to establish religious protocol in place of personal (biblical) faith that the Catholic Church can simply not be considered a true Christian (biblical) Church. But I digress. Read the New Testament and see what it says about faith vs religion. Religion always suffocates and kills, but The Spirit gives life. (John 6:63 & 2 Cor 3:6).
🙄 You didn’t hear one point of what I said. Read your Bible and trust in Jesus alone to save not a dead man-made religion that considers the Pope infallible. What hullabaloo. Ye must be born again. Once you are born of the Spirit you will understand. Over and out.
Thank you! Thank you
A fascinating read of an event I've never heard of. Lots to ponder in this post...
Lucia Dos Santos translates to "light of the saints" in Portuguese.
Maybe the phenomenon that "broke reality" also refused to be photographed because you know, God... he works in mysterious ways. Maybe what was seen was meant to be seen by human eyes only. Maybe Faith is why.
The Vatican, under pressure because all of the apparent photographers present didn't have a photo because the miracle would not be recorded decided to float a fake picture to buy more belief in the miracle.
One can see by the comments that most wars are about religion lol, anyway Thank you great article !
Re:Fatima: LA Marzulli has done extensive published research into the phenomena and characterized it as an ‘encounter of the third kind’ and the ‘miracle of the sun’ as a UFO.
i wrote an epistolary series pondering ethics, religion, sexuality, and girlhood: https://open.substack.com/pub/gracekwan/p/v-afternoons-with-sisyphus?r=5psnw&utm_medium=ios
Thank you for highlighting the Catholic church in burying secrets. One would think being the papal ‘agents of God’ would be forthcoming and truthful.
However, their actions over the past 70 years have shown us a totally different story.
Read “The Return of the Gods” by Jonathan Cahn.
The Catholic Church has been infiltrated for the last 700 years by Freemasons, Marxists, Socialist’s and Satanists.
They bastardized and minimized everything about the history and traditions of the church.
Their goal is to drive out God.
We are in a spiritual war.
One of the most comprehensible and interesting articles I ever read about Fatima. It’s a very long read examining Fatima and its history leading up to this most turbulent time period we all currently exist within today. Is Pope Leo the last pope overseeing the end times which might just be playing out in real time before all of us today?
We need to all ask God for discernment in navigating this dangerous landscape we are forced to exist within. Stay aware, stay informed and listen to your heart and keep your soul a priority.
Jesus warned us about deception the most in the bible. At no other time in human history has deception played such a large role in society. With the advent of technology and AI it’s becoming so hard to distinguish fact from fiction. I don’t think God will tolerate this world of illusion much longer.
Are we part of the generation of the book of revelation which will witness the return of Christ?
I would like to add a comment to what you wrote. You mentioned discernment which is no small gift God has given His children. I want to elaborate and add the words spiritual discernment. Gods Word encourages us to be sober and be vigilant because our adversary the devil roams like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour. I believe the level of spiritual warfare going on around us even today is more than our little pea brains can fathom. It’s so important for each of us to suit up in the armor He has given us not only for defense against the wiles of the enemy, but also for offense. We don’t have to sit back in our rocking chairs and be passive in this battle, but have the Sword of the Spirit, the Word of God, and we are able to bring the battle to our enemy. Well those are my thoughts on the subject. I love each of you and love reading the articles and the comments from my brothers in arms.
I only subscribe to real journalists on Substack, wisewolf included
The power hierarchy of the Catholic Church have always used it as a vehicle to express dominion over the people and to serve dark interests.
Yet despite this, the same Church has provided a structure for those who aspired for divine revelation and connection with the divine reality spoken of by the one known as Jesus.
A bit like the black and white tiled pattern in a masonic temple - giving you a choice to stand on a tile that you identify with.