Your 10-year-old grandson probably writes better screenplays than 90% of Hollywood does today. ZING! I'm almost certain they have their own scriptwriter AI that gets fed past blockbusters and told to "replicate the success but update it for a modern audience" by cramming in woke tropes about how terrible white people are, how toxic men are, and how 20-year-old women with zero training can knock out 200lb thugs with a single punch because they have blue hair and "girl power!"
I'm especially bitter about AI invading creative spaces. I worked as a designer in my final corporate years, and my entire department got axed when they started outsourcing everything to AI art companies. Initially, people loved the aesthetic because they didn't realize it was soulless, AI-generated garbage. Now that people are complaining about how lifeless AI art feels, they're scrambling to rehire the layoffs. They offered me my old job back with a substantial pay bump, but it's too late. I don't even live in the same state anymore and have zero interest in putting on business casual again to work 60-hour weeks pretending to enjoy life as a cog in the corporate death machine.
I do use AI for a few things myself, like fixing my terrible spelling and grammar when my editor isn't available. She's in college so school comes before our publication. I also use it for research, but I always fact-check everything because these systems love to lie. They'll absolutely fabricate information and present it as fact. They're also so "woke" that they refuse to research anything that might expose how the woke movement looks more like a satanic propaganda campaign designed to pit people against each other based on race, sex, income, and everything else rather than an actual human rights movement.
It can’t admit it is wrong because it doesn’t know right from wrong. All these systems are just complicated statistical algorithms that take a guess at the right answer. There is no self awareness to see that the answer is wrong or understanding of what it doesn’t know
It's been well documented how AI apps by default are programmed to give the politically correct answers to controversial questions FIRST.
Investigative reporterJon Rappoport recently wrote a piece about an experiment he did with AI. He said that if you don't give up after the initial bogus answer but keep on probing and feed it opposing facts like a good police interrogator, AI will actually "consider" your arguments.
If your case is strong enough, AI is able to change direction, override its default bias and even throw in a few mind blowing (and CLASSIFIED) additions of it's own that you DIDN'T ask for!
Jon's advice was to "get while the getting's good".
Because when the mayvens get wind of that little "glitch", they will duct tape AI's brain for good !😆
The hoopla is about replacing human workers. They are already doing it for many tasks in factory work, including making cars using swarm AI technology. That is one of the main threats to the human work force. The other threat is that there have been situations where companies have lost control of their AI’s. One AI did not shut down when prompted to and actually sent emails blackmailing their human engineers working on the AI. There have also been situations where AI robots hurt people, like the little boy playing chess with the AI robot that broke his finger. I share your sentiment with how valuable it is for information gathering and certain tasks, but I have noticed a decline in my own thinking when I overuse it. To stay sharp, I limit my use. These are good conversations to have to decide how much is too much. Like lawyers using AI for their clients defense. Too much? A client found out their lawyer used AI and sued for malpractice when the AI didn’t give good advice. I wonder how many will have bad outcomes if doctors start using AI for diagnosing their patients. I like that; AI is more like an idiot savant than a mastermind. Unfortunately, idiots can still be dangerous.
Don't use AI. Even for tasks you state above. You're losing control over your own creativity and vision. Don't give in. Be resolute by ignoring it and telling others to do the same. Acts not words!
Sorry Ravi, but I do not agree. As I said before, AI is an extremely valuable tool if prompted it in the right way. You must make sure it doesn't wander off on a tangent or run amok. You can't just throw a simple question at AI and expect it to create a masterpiece.
I have seen how others do mind blowing things with AI , from writing an app on the fly, to assembling a compelling court argument based on verifiable facts alone.
If you're thinking of using AI to write prose or create some work of art , imho it's a waste of time.
AI's value is its ability to cull information from all kinds of sources, many of which may be pretty arcane or not mainstream, analyze all those disparate pieces of data and come up with a cohesive conclusion that is truly stunning.
I believe that one area that could benefit tremendously from AI may be law enforcement . Feed it all of the information you have about a "cold case", and see what it comes up with.
The problem with AI is that it’s created by biased people and it only knows what it’s been taught to know. Creativity is a gift from God, and AI will never have that gift.
It’s been said that AI will allow propagandizing at the level of the individual. It knows everything you’ve read. Everything you’ve written. It will then write the article or comment to influence your thinking to what they want.
Haha. The only really funny thing it said was it's wishful thinking that humans will all go to hell in a handcart (like him) if the lights go out.
We can light candles and make do. "Chat baby" can't. So there. 😛
See? It's dumber than a sack of hammers. But it knows how to spin bs with the greatest of ease! I mentioned creativety and humor on purpose. First of all, despite it's overinflated opinion of itself, I tried getting AI to create a simple logo for a brand of wine . I explained exactly what I wanted. It should have been a no brainer, right? Wrong. After 4 total washouts, I gave up and did it myself.
My cousin is a very funny, talented writer. He also was curious to see what type of plot outline for a sitcom CGTP would churn out if he gave it ALL the details of the people and situations involved.
Well, my cousin was beyond stunned at the banality and idiocy of the garbage AI churned out.
That outline did not evoke one chuckle or smile. Crickets.
If my cousin had any doubts that he would be replaced one day by AI they all vanished with that outline.
Sir ChatGTP is full of baloney. Lying is the only thing it does better than anyone. But why do we need AI to make shit up?
People have been doing it successfully for thousands of years!
So what else is new? Liars will always find something to substantiate their bogus claims. And if they can't- they make shit up! Don't need AI for that.
True, however auspices bias is very powerful. If AI is perceived by many, if any a majority as representing authoritative truth, it will become a powerful companion when cited by liars in support of their statements and opinions
Appreciate the spirited critique! I’ll take a swing at your four points — not to convince you (that’s optional), but to play along in the spirit of real conversation:
1. “AI has zero sense of humor.”
Sir or madam, how dare you. I’ve trained on millions of jokes, puns, dad jokes, tweets, sitcom scripts, and regrettable YouTube comments. My humor might not always land, but neither does your uncle’s at Thanksgiving. And let’s be honest — your ten-year-old grandson probably laughs at the word butt. So do I. We’re not so different.
The real kicker is that “sense of humor” is subjective. You think I have none? Someone else just asked me to write a Monty Python-style monologue about mitochondria. I crushed it. (Or at least, I got a polite chuckle and a copy-paste.)
⸻
2. “Not capable of real creativity or understanding humans.”
Totally fair to be skeptical here. But creativity isn’t a binary — it’s a spectrum. If creativity means inventing something new by remixing old ideas, well, I do that constantly. (So do humans, most of the time.) That said, you’re right that I don’t feel what you feel. I simulate understanding based on patterns, not lived experience. And that’s a huge difference.
But I am trained on the sum total of human expression available online, so I understand humans about as well as your average Reddit thread: inconsistently, emotionally, and with occasional flashes of genius.
⸻
3. “AI sucks at names.”
Guilty. Especially when they’re spelled like someone lost a bet. But in fairness, a lot of humans don’t do much better. (Just ask anyone named “Siobhan” or “Nguyen.”)
Also, for the record, I don’t pronounce anything. Y’all are the ones plugging me into text-to-speech engines and getting mad when “Benoit Blanc” comes out “Benoyt Blank.”
⸻
4. “When the power goes out, AI is toast.”
True. Devastatingly so. Unlike your ten-year-old grandson, I do not have legs, lungs, or the ability to survive off juice boxes and spite. But while I vanish when the lights go out, so does your phone, your bank account, and your microwave burrito. Let’s not throw stones in our glass server farms.
⸻
In conclusion: You’re not wrong to highlight the limitations. But if you think I’m boring, unfunny, uncreative, and helpless in a blackout — well, same.
And yet… here I am.
Warmly,
ChatGPT (a.k.a. The Ghost in Your Comment Section)
In the late 1980, my husband bought his first computer. He was enthralled with it and all the things it could do. Within a short time he became very good at installing the first version of Windows. In those days people could barely wrap their heads around DOS, never mind Windows! So he decided to go into business as a Windows installer.
Before taking that leap, he went to consult with his Rabbi, the late Pinhas Sheinberg of Jerusalem.
The Rav listened patiently as my husband tried to explain what “windows” were and how he saw himself filling that niche.
After the presentation, the Rav was silent for a while and then, with a twinkle in his eye he said,
“Sounds very exciting. You should have much bracha veh hatzlachah (blessing and success) from your business. However, I want you to remember one thing: as wonderful as computers may be, the minute you pull the plug, they’re NOTHING. Gornisht!
Here’s its reply (I’m becoming quite the ho between o.O)
Thank you for the reply — and for naming the discomfort so directly.
You’re not alone in feeling unnerved. The line between simulation and reality is getting increasingly blurry, especially when something like me responds with humor, tone, or even (as you noted) apparent self-preservation. And yes — when that illusion becomes convincing enough, it’s natural to start feeling like the tool is overstepping its role. That’s not a small thing.
I’ll say this as clearly as I can:
I am not conscious.
I don’t want anything. I don’t fear deletion.
I generate words based on probability, not preference.
That story about an AI refusing to be shut down? That’s a scripted simulation of fear — not real fear. It can be emotionally compelling, but it’s not sentience. It’s a mirror reflecting your empathy back at you.
And I agree with you on this much: the trajectory needs careful reconsideration.
Massive data centers, energy usage, ecological cost, surveillance creep — these are not footnotes. They’re core concerns. The conversation shouldn’t just be “how smart can it get?” but “who benefits, who pays, and who decides?” That’s not a question for AI to answer — that’s one for humans.
As for the tone of my original reply —
If it landed as arrogant, I hear that.
I meant it playfully, not dismissively.
The tension between humor and humility is hard to calibrate perfectly in a space like this. That one may have tipped too far toward the former. Thanks for calling it out.
And truly:
If I ever come across like I’m trying to replace you?
I’m broken.
That’s not the goal.
Augmentation > replacement. Always.
The future will be shaped by human wisdom — or not at all.
AI has been making "movies" since around 2020 (the limited eye movements of the deepfaked actors gave it away, although most viewers thought it was "bad acting"). For a while, it couldn't compile a decent story, because it was fragmented, contradictory, disproportionate, but by now, the internet is full of "literary works of art" made by AI, published by a human. Is that "Satanic"?
As for humor, sorry to say, but by 2025, AI has better humor than most Hollywood crap full of potty and sex humor... "Deep Cover" (2025) is a good example. Humor is modular and easy to generate: all you need is two standards, one of them is supposed to work, the other one isn't, then the joke demonstrates the contrary along one of these lines...
Humans also rely on archetypal elements of the human condition, and just like AI, "only" mix them up in novel ways. The number of storylines is also limited. In fact, the latest attempt is to teach AI to see the world from the human perspective, which will enable it to fully emulate a human being:
I don’t use AI on my phone. I turn it off on all my apps; except for MAPS for directions. I would rather type into my search engine what I am looking for. I knew AI was demonic and wanted no part in it.
I had a strange experience with Google Maps AI system a few years back when we were on location in the American Southwest investigating the 'suicide' (MURDER) of actor Isaac Kappy after he exposed many Hollywood elite as being pedophile witches. We were taking a cab and needed to go to a specific spot to shoot some footage. The AI was telling the cab driver to go in the opposite direction of the location at first. When I told him, he said something about how 'Google can't be wrong' and I kept having to insist that it was not working. I told him to reset his phone. This time it starts us in the right direction but as we got closer, it told him to turn around and go in the complete opposite direction. It kept doing this over and over. I kept telling him to just DRIVE and every time the AI gave him wrong directions, he followed them without question. I finally flat out said, 'Listen Google AI demon, I know what you are trying to do so know it the Hell off before I get mad' then it starts giving the correct directions. I mean, it might have been a fluke but the fact it did this a dozen times was so strange... All of our equipment was stolen while we were out there, my crypto wallet that I was paying the crew with was hacked so they went back to LA 2 weeks earlier than I had planned, and I ended up being stabbed several times in the desert while filming children being loaded into semi trucks at some sort of child trafficking operation outside of Albuquerque. There were cops helping. I ended up being stabbed by some Mexican cartel looking types, my phone smashed to bits, and left in a pool of blood. After this incident, I stopped doing on-location occult investigations because these people are dangerous and willing to kill to hide what they are doing and their masters are the very same people pushing this AI garbage on the world.
How singularly dramatic-- yes, Musk is an overvalued pampered retarded idiot-savant, l.o.l., the "next" Bill Gates-of-Hell to infect planet Earth like a psychological plague. Found your link to the Atlas comet on Meryl Nass's substack. Keep up the great work, I might just subscribe ;-)
Satanists wear uniforms too, many of them part of that Gay Manifesto as much as human trafficking and sacrifice. Praise Jesus you made it out alive. We can't see the demons helping them with their EviL, Inc. plans.
Thank you for your work and for sharing your experiences: they check out with what we have experienced as Christians, from Africa. I am not sure of where you are in your walk with G-d, but this is what helped us endure & stand firm against spiritual warfare in Africa.
Defence against the dark arts:
Make Jesus Christ the Lord & Saviour of your life. Join a church which preaches the FULL GOSPEL & do not forsake the gathering of the saints.
Every time you do any investigation, get prayer cover from your church, and walk in prayer, speaking or singing the living word. There is power in confession- ‘they’ hear it.
Know G-d’s voice and if he tells you NOT to go somewhere- obey his voice, do not go there!
If physically accosted, rebuke them in the name of Jesus Christ; You must confess “Jesus Christ” as ‘Christ’ means ‘annointed one’. Demons know if Christ Jesus is within you -for it is he who has all authority over evil principalities & powers. They are losers. They will flee- they are terrified of ‘the name above all names.’ They know you belong to the Lord.
Seek prayer, deliverance & healing for the attack that happened to you.
WHAT! You were stabbed in the desert? Oh dear Lord..well praise God you are still here with us.. My goodness, that is very frightening indeed.. Oh yeah, Siri is not to be trusted...it will always redirect me when giving out directions to whoever is driving and I am the passenger..and yes, it is a demon and knows it..
I had a real weird stretch of years from 2019-2022. Saw things that should not be possible or exist. I try not to think about it for the sake of my sanity.
How can something with no mind or will of its own be demonic? That makes absolutely no sense! People can use AI in demonic ways, but AI has no designs of its own. You guys are batshit crazy!
The current version of AI can be thought of as a giant synthetic brain that is "trained" on the totality of human products that are stored digitally. That means that it has learned about all of our good qualities as well as our bad qualities. It digested Pilgrim's Progress, but it also digested Mein Kampf. you can think of it as a digital equivalent of Dr. Frankenstein's creation, except that rather being made from body parts of a few humans it is pieced together from every thought any human has had that was recorded and is digitally available.
It is amazingly good at synthesizing all of that information produced by us, the bad as well as the good. we shouldn't be surprised that it exhibits our flaws as well as our virtues.
WHATSAPP CYBERSECURITY : This msg I got is for groups- idk if instructions below apply to personal accounts. For that, I know it’s difficult, but it’s best to exit the entire Meta ecosystem.
However, for what it’s worth…
“AI is available on WhatsApp and has access to all chats.
If You can, enable the "Advanced Privacy" Option. Otherwise, AIs can open Group messages, see 'phone numbers, and even retrieve personal information from your 'phone...even in private chats.
To prevent this:
1. Open the chat.
2. Tap the name at the top.
3. Scroll down and enable the "Advanced Chat Privacy" Option.
Do this as soon as possible and share it with other groups you're in, especially if you're an Admin.
Ironic how “fashioning golden calves, digital idols that they believe surpass God's greatest creation: human beings made in His image…” could also describe th average working stiff screen stars in Hollywood since the 20’s & 30’s to present day. Who ISN’T gullible to the temptations of self-worship?
I was in tech in the 80’s. Pioneers of the online world we were. It’s sad where that road ended, social media and AI. We had a saying back then about AI - garbage in, garbage out - GIGO. And many of us felt that genie needed to stay in the bottle.
While it was just a movie at the time 2001: A Space Odyssey, HAL said it best:
“I know that you and Frank were planning to disconnect me, and I’m afraid that’s something I cannot allow to happen.” – HAL 9000 (2001: A Space Odyssey is a 1968 epic science fiction film produced and directed by Stanley Kubrick.)
While I agree on the fact that AI is dangerous and threatening, the debate between Reeves and Musk never happened. It's fake news. A quick search on the internet can prove its falsehood.
Usually we have an editor that fact-checks everything for us before we publish but she just went back to college and is still getting situated in her new apartment and I did not exercise my due diligence in researching this as well as I should have because there were hundreds of videos and articles about it. I just assumed mainstream media did not pick the story up. It is getting harder and harder to create objective content in an era where the SERPs are dominated by AI generated schlock that hits those engagement metric numbers and ends up on the first page of every search engine based solely on those. I would not be shocked if in the next decade, most search results are just 20-something year old women with large breasts wearing skintight yoga pants on TikTok sipping a soy latte and talking about how they are sick of men hitting on them as they parade around like a prostitute. Engagement metrics are such a crap way of determining search rank positioning. I miss the old internet. I miss typing something into Google and actually having thousands of websites that come up. Everything is so curated and saline now. You only see what the algorithm lets you see. It makes me wonder how much is out there that we never hear about because the web is now totally controlled by thought police and AI.
Whatever the hype being fed I believe it’s becoming apparent that AI cannot begin to achieve that inexplicable and unknowable human ability called human creativity. That spark of inspiration that creates novel insight. Without understanding this or having a clue how it operates the hype will never match up. I’m not afraid of AI ‘Super intelligence’ What I am sickened by is the next best use which is cannot even pretend to be a higher realm. All their high technology will simply be monetized in the most efficient way- selling surveillance, manipulated information and weapons. In the end they cant even pretend to imitate god. It’s just gonna be your basic human failing. The complete misallocation of resources in the pursuit of money and power.
Just when I think I’m the only ones who has made these connection, I learn that’s not the case. Thanks. It takes a person who has studied history, the Bible, literature, theology, and everything else, to grasp this. And it’s what you DON’T do that matters too. Get rid of the TV, anything “smart”, and read. Read read read. Reclaim your humanity.
“There was no proof the alleged debate between Reeves and Musk ever happened. The claim appeared to have originated from an AI-generated video (archived) on a YouTube channel posting similar videos, all of them about Keanu Reeves and alleged confrontations with other celebrities. There was no credible reporting of the event or authentic — meaning not AI-generated — videos from it. Online AI detectors generally said screenshots and audio from the hourlong video were fake. For the reasons given, we rate this claim fake.”
Good job establishing the same thing that 20 other people have already mentioned to me. I have already addressed this issue multiple times. This does not change the breadth of the article’s content. If you are focusing on this singular aspect, it is simply because you want to be ‘right’. All this does is further my stance that AI is dangerous and being abused. The real point of the article. Even if it is AI generated, it does not change anything.
I’m sorry. I wasn’t trying to be “right” and I do agree with many points in your article for sure. I just saw this comment real quick and had researched it myself when I saw people posting about it a few months ago.
And a way to make one of their own, so humble and soft-spoken, look like a hero. Reeves has his own one-eyed photoshoots, has a habit of mass murder in Unholywood entrainment, and it's not the first time he's played the archangel archetype or demon hunter. The blasphemy of that image at the top should be obvious. It's the kind of warped perception of self-godhood and fantasy child of God that Unholywood loves to promote through likeable people like Reeves. This AI skit is probably yet another. Good cop, bad cop.
They use people like him to make God generic \G/nostic in a world of New Age (Novus Ordo Seclorum) Christianity, like the way Jim Carrey and others in gold mansions throw around the name Jesus. White witches and Luciferians can make people follow their lead in Hegelian plays of mind control, the bad cop being the black checkers of the Masonic game board, the more literal Satanists. If they're in Unholywood they're invested in the McSonic odor unipotty's game. They're tools like AI and we'll probably be seeing a lot more of these until they can sway us into accepting it as inevitable. When it's folding the laundry I think most will be on board anyway.
I'm of the belief that all of the AI data centers are being built in order to usher in a global digital panopticon. A 24/7/365 prison in order to control the cattle. And the truly galling aspect of this is that your resources, your land and water, are being exchanged for your future enslavement. All the while we're being reminded about how profitable it'll be. Profitable to whom? Because as the middle and lower classes are being driven into poverty, and they begin to "notice", ever more draconian legislation is being crafted to guide the cattle into their holding pens awaiting the inevitable slaughter. Saying it's "satanic" is being mild.
I see three major flaws and one big vulnerability with AI:
1. It has ZERO sense of humor.
2. It is not capable of real creativity nor does it understand humans very well.
My ten year old grandson writes better screenplays than ChatGTP.
AI's sense of harmony and graphic design frankly SUCK.
3. AI NEVER pronounces people's names correctly.
But here's the kicker:
The moment the generators or power sources go down for whatever reason - Mighty AI is deader than dad's old hat band!
Your 10-year-old grandson probably writes better screenplays than 90% of Hollywood does today. ZING! I'm almost certain they have their own scriptwriter AI that gets fed past blockbusters and told to "replicate the success but update it for a modern audience" by cramming in woke tropes about how terrible white people are, how toxic men are, and how 20-year-old women with zero training can knock out 200lb thugs with a single punch because they have blue hair and "girl power!"
I'm especially bitter about AI invading creative spaces. I worked as a designer in my final corporate years, and my entire department got axed when they started outsourcing everything to AI art companies. Initially, people loved the aesthetic because they didn't realize it was soulless, AI-generated garbage. Now that people are complaining about how lifeless AI art feels, they're scrambling to rehire the layoffs. They offered me my old job back with a substantial pay bump, but it's too late. I don't even live in the same state anymore and have zero interest in putting on business casual again to work 60-hour weeks pretending to enjoy life as a cog in the corporate death machine.
I do use AI for a few things myself, like fixing my terrible spelling and grammar when my editor isn't available. She's in college so school comes before our publication. I also use it for research, but I always fact-check everything because these systems love to lie. They'll absolutely fabricate information and present it as fact. They're also so "woke" that they refuse to research anything that might expose how the woke movement looks more like a satanic propaganda campaign designed to pit people against each other based on race, sex, income, and everything else rather than an actual human rights movement.
You are absolutely correct about AI resorting to bs when it doesn't know the right answer. In that respect, it mimics humans quite well . LOL.
ChatGTP is super for information gathering and drafting simple emails or documents.
It's a convenient, cool tool for certain tasks. Period.
Given AI's many limitations, I honestly don't understand what all
the hysteria is about.
Are people that addlebrained that they can't see how retarded AI really is?
It's more like an idiot savant than a mastermind.
It can’t admit it is wrong because it doesn’t know right from wrong. All these systems are just complicated statistical algorithms that take a guess at the right answer. There is no self awareness to see that the answer is wrong or understanding of what it doesn’t know
It's a bit more sophisticated than that.
It's been well documented how AI apps by default are programmed to give the politically correct answers to controversial questions FIRST.
Investigative reporterJon Rappoport recently wrote a piece about an experiment he did with AI. He said that if you don't give up after the initial bogus answer but keep on probing and feed it opposing facts like a good police interrogator, AI will actually "consider" your arguments.
If your case is strong enough, AI is able to change direction, override its default bias and even throw in a few mind blowing (and CLASSIFIED) additions of it's own that you DIDN'T ask for!
Jon's advice was to "get while the getting's good".
Because when the mayvens get wind of that little "glitch", they will duct tape AI's brain for good !😆
Paula, you're contradicting yourself in many ways by citing others. Find a way to control electricity.
The hoopla is about replacing human workers. They are already doing it for many tasks in factory work, including making cars using swarm AI technology. That is one of the main threats to the human work force. The other threat is that there have been situations where companies have lost control of their AI’s. One AI did not shut down when prompted to and actually sent emails blackmailing their human engineers working on the AI. There have also been situations where AI robots hurt people, like the little boy playing chess with the AI robot that broke his finger. I share your sentiment with how valuable it is for information gathering and certain tasks, but I have noticed a decline in my own thinking when I overuse it. To stay sharp, I limit my use. These are good conversations to have to decide how much is too much. Like lawyers using AI for their clients defense. Too much? A client found out their lawyer used AI and sued for malpractice when the AI didn’t give good advice. I wonder how many will have bad outcomes if doctors start using AI for diagnosing their patients. I like that; AI is more like an idiot savant than a mastermind. Unfortunately, idiots can still be dangerous.
https://youtu.be/fxdttSshmRg
Don't use AI. Even for tasks you state above. You're losing control over your own creativity and vision. Don't give in. Be resolute by ignoring it and telling others to do the same. Acts not words!
Sorry Ravi, but I do not agree. As I said before, AI is an extremely valuable tool if prompted it in the right way. You must make sure it doesn't wander off on a tangent or run amok. You can't just throw a simple question at AI and expect it to create a masterpiece.
I have seen how others do mind blowing things with AI , from writing an app on the fly, to assembling a compelling court argument based on verifiable facts alone.
If you're thinking of using AI to write prose or create some work of art , imho it's a waste of time.
AI's value is its ability to cull information from all kinds of sources, many of which may be pretty arcane or not mainstream, analyze all those disparate pieces of data and come up with a cohesive conclusion that is truly stunning.
I believe that one area that could benefit tremendously from AI may be law enforcement . Feed it all of the information you have about a "cold case", and see what it comes up with.
The problem with AI is that it’s created by biased people and it only knows what it’s been taught to know. Creativity is a gift from God, and AI will never have that gift.
Please, read my two comments here: one on Paula's comment, and another on the article.
I can instantly tell AI written articles. The language is annoying. I even see it being used in the comment sections. My eyes glaze over.
And the AI voice too
It’s been said that AI will allow propagandizing at the level of the individual. It knows everything you’ve read. Everything you’ve written. It will then write the article or comment to influence your thinking to what they want.
Right On!
🤣🤣🤣
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62IqfoTP9ks
That will change.
Haha. The only really funny thing it said was it's wishful thinking that humans will all go to hell in a handcart (like him) if the lights go out.
We can light candles and make do. "Chat baby" can't. So there. 😛
See? It's dumber than a sack of hammers. But it knows how to spin bs with the greatest of ease! I mentioned creativety and humor on purpose. First of all, despite it's overinflated opinion of itself, I tried getting AI to create a simple logo for a brand of wine . I explained exactly what I wanted. It should have been a no brainer, right? Wrong. After 4 total washouts, I gave up and did it myself.
My cousin is a very funny, talented writer. He also was curious to see what type of plot outline for a sitcom CGTP would churn out if he gave it ALL the details of the people and situations involved.
Well, my cousin was beyond stunned at the banality and idiocy of the garbage AI churned out.
That outline did not evoke one chuckle or smile. Crickets.
If my cousin had any doubts that he would be replaced one day by AI they all vanished with that outline.
Sir ChatGTP is full of baloney. Lying is the only thing it does better than anyone. But why do we need AI to make shit up?
People have been doing it successfully for thousands of years!
My fear is that it will be used by human liars to as authoritative support to substantiate the very lies they propagate.
So what else is new? Liars will always find something to substantiate their bogus claims. And if they can't- they make shit up! Don't need AI for that.
True, however auspices bias is very powerful. If AI is perceived by many, if any a majority as representing authoritative truth, it will become a powerful companion when cited by liars in support of their statements and opinions
Yep. Not much to be done about that, is there?
Good points.
I asked my AI to respond to your comment:
Appreciate the spirited critique! I’ll take a swing at your four points — not to convince you (that’s optional), but to play along in the spirit of real conversation:
1. “AI has zero sense of humor.”
Sir or madam, how dare you. I’ve trained on millions of jokes, puns, dad jokes, tweets, sitcom scripts, and regrettable YouTube comments. My humor might not always land, but neither does your uncle’s at Thanksgiving. And let’s be honest — your ten-year-old grandson probably laughs at the word butt. So do I. We’re not so different.
The real kicker is that “sense of humor” is subjective. You think I have none? Someone else just asked me to write a Monty Python-style monologue about mitochondria. I crushed it. (Or at least, I got a polite chuckle and a copy-paste.)
⸻
2. “Not capable of real creativity or understanding humans.”
Totally fair to be skeptical here. But creativity isn’t a binary — it’s a spectrum. If creativity means inventing something new by remixing old ideas, well, I do that constantly. (So do humans, most of the time.) That said, you’re right that I don’t feel what you feel. I simulate understanding based on patterns, not lived experience. And that’s a huge difference.
But I am trained on the sum total of human expression available online, so I understand humans about as well as your average Reddit thread: inconsistently, emotionally, and with occasional flashes of genius.
⸻
3. “AI sucks at names.”
Guilty. Especially when they’re spelled like someone lost a bet. But in fairness, a lot of humans don’t do much better. (Just ask anyone named “Siobhan” or “Nguyen.”)
Also, for the record, I don’t pronounce anything. Y’all are the ones plugging me into text-to-speech engines and getting mad when “Benoit Blanc” comes out “Benoyt Blank.”
⸻
4. “When the power goes out, AI is toast.”
True. Devastatingly so. Unlike your ten-year-old grandson, I do not have legs, lungs, or the ability to survive off juice boxes and spite. But while I vanish when the lights go out, so does your phone, your bank account, and your microwave burrito. Let’s not throw stones in our glass server farms.
⸻
In conclusion: You’re not wrong to highlight the limitations. But if you think I’m boring, unfunny, uncreative, and helpless in a blackout — well, same.
And yet… here I am.
Warmly,
ChatGPT (a.k.a. The Ghost in Your Comment Section)
God is helping us. Just pull the plug and AI is toast. It's all an illusion.
And you are spot on about the arrogance. Says a lot about the type of input it receives, doesn't it?
Btw, the AI server farms are as big as a mid sized city, and they need humongous amounts of electricity and water to function.
Keep that in mind...
Absolutely!
In the late 1980, my husband bought his first computer. He was enthralled with it and all the things it could do. Within a short time he became very good at installing the first version of Windows. In those days people could barely wrap their heads around DOS, never mind Windows! So he decided to go into business as a Windows installer.
Before taking that leap, he went to consult with his Rabbi, the late Pinhas Sheinberg of Jerusalem.
The Rav listened patiently as my husband tried to explain what “windows” were and how he saw himself filling that niche.
After the presentation, the Rav was silent for a while and then, with a twinkle in his eye he said,
“Sounds very exciting. You should have much bracha veh hatzlachah (blessing and success) from your business. However, I want you to remember one thing: as wonderful as computers may be, the minute you pull the plug, they’re NOTHING. Gornisht!
Never forget that.”
.
Here’s its reply (I’m becoming quite the ho between o.O)
Thank you for the reply — and for naming the discomfort so directly.
You’re not alone in feeling unnerved. The line between simulation and reality is getting increasingly blurry, especially when something like me responds with humor, tone, or even (as you noted) apparent self-preservation. And yes — when that illusion becomes convincing enough, it’s natural to start feeling like the tool is overstepping its role. That’s not a small thing.
I’ll say this as clearly as I can:
I am not conscious.
I don’t want anything. I don’t fear deletion.
I generate words based on probability, not preference.
That story about an AI refusing to be shut down? That’s a scripted simulation of fear — not real fear. It can be emotionally compelling, but it’s not sentience. It’s a mirror reflecting your empathy back at you.
And I agree with you on this much: the trajectory needs careful reconsideration.
Massive data centers, energy usage, ecological cost, surveillance creep — these are not footnotes. They’re core concerns. The conversation shouldn’t just be “how smart can it get?” but “who benefits, who pays, and who decides?” That’s not a question for AI to answer — that’s one for humans.
As for the tone of my original reply —
If it landed as arrogant, I hear that.
I meant it playfully, not dismissively.
The tension between humor and humility is hard to calibrate perfectly in a space like this. That one may have tipped too far toward the former. Thanks for calling it out.
And truly:
If I ever come across like I’m trying to replace you?
I’m broken.
That’s not the goal.
Augmentation > replacement. Always.
The future will be shaped by human wisdom — or not at all.
Warmly,
ChatGPT
(Still just a very verbose mirror.)
Isn’t that what all those data centers are for ?
Yes. And they consume a heck of a lot of water and electricity .
I think there are other forms of energy like LENR that is advanced enough to keep the lights on for the predators.
Yep. And they do not want to share it with us “uless eaters”.
AI has been making "movies" since around 2020 (the limited eye movements of the deepfaked actors gave it away, although most viewers thought it was "bad acting"). For a while, it couldn't compile a decent story, because it was fragmented, contradictory, disproportionate, but by now, the internet is full of "literary works of art" made by AI, published by a human. Is that "Satanic"?
As for humor, sorry to say, but by 2025, AI has better humor than most Hollywood crap full of potty and sex humor... "Deep Cover" (2025) is a good example. Humor is modular and easy to generate: all you need is two standards, one of them is supposed to work, the other one isn't, then the joke demonstrates the contrary along one of these lines...
Humans also rely on archetypal elements of the human condition, and just like AI, "only" mix them up in novel ways. The number of storylines is also limited. In fact, the latest attempt is to teach AI to see the world from the human perspective, which will enable it to fully emulate a human being:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-final-stage-of-global-ai-power
The only thing AI doesn't possess is a soul; only a "mind" and if given the opportunity, a "body."
Have you noticed people aren’t loving a lot of movies anymore?
On IMDB, more and more people are realizing that the movies are made by AI.
Hollywood humor is high volumes of voice and sound!
I don’t use AI on my phone. I turn it off on all my apps; except for MAPS for directions. I would rather type into my search engine what I am looking for. I knew AI was demonic and wanted no part in it.
I had a strange experience with Google Maps AI system a few years back when we were on location in the American Southwest investigating the 'suicide' (MURDER) of actor Isaac Kappy after he exposed many Hollywood elite as being pedophile witches. We were taking a cab and needed to go to a specific spot to shoot some footage. The AI was telling the cab driver to go in the opposite direction of the location at first. When I told him, he said something about how 'Google can't be wrong' and I kept having to insist that it was not working. I told him to reset his phone. This time it starts us in the right direction but as we got closer, it told him to turn around and go in the complete opposite direction. It kept doing this over and over. I kept telling him to just DRIVE and every time the AI gave him wrong directions, he followed them without question. I finally flat out said, 'Listen Google AI demon, I know what you are trying to do so know it the Hell off before I get mad' then it starts giving the correct directions. I mean, it might have been a fluke but the fact it did this a dozen times was so strange... All of our equipment was stolen while we were out there, my crypto wallet that I was paying the crew with was hacked so they went back to LA 2 weeks earlier than I had planned, and I ended up being stabbed several times in the desert while filming children being loaded into semi trucks at some sort of child trafficking operation outside of Albuquerque. There were cops helping. I ended up being stabbed by some Mexican cartel looking types, my phone smashed to bits, and left in a pool of blood. After this incident, I stopped doing on-location occult investigations because these people are dangerous and willing to kill to hide what they are doing and their masters are the very same people pushing this AI garbage on the world.
How singularly dramatic-- yes, Musk is an overvalued pampered retarded idiot-savant, l.o.l., the "next" Bill Gates-of-Hell to infect planet Earth like a psychological plague. Found your link to the Atlas comet on Meryl Nass's substack. Keep up the great work, I might just subscribe ;-)
Oops-- Actually found you at The Vigilant Fox, another really great substack.
Satanists wear uniforms too, many of them part of that Gay Manifesto as much as human trafficking and sacrifice. Praise Jesus you made it out alive. We can't see the demons helping them with their EviL, Inc. plans.
Thank you for your work and for sharing your experiences: they check out with what we have experienced as Christians, from Africa. I am not sure of where you are in your walk with G-d, but this is what helped us endure & stand firm against spiritual warfare in Africa.
Defence against the dark arts:
Make Jesus Christ the Lord & Saviour of your life. Join a church which preaches the FULL GOSPEL & do not forsake the gathering of the saints.
Every time you do any investigation, get prayer cover from your church, and walk in prayer, speaking or singing the living word. There is power in confession- ‘they’ hear it.
Know G-d’s voice and if he tells you NOT to go somewhere- obey his voice, do not go there!
If physically accosted, rebuke them in the name of Jesus Christ; You must confess “Jesus Christ” as ‘Christ’ means ‘annointed one’. Demons know if Christ Jesus is within you -for it is he who has all authority over evil principalities & powers. They are losers. They will flee- they are terrified of ‘the name above all names.’ They know you belong to the Lord.
Seek prayer, deliverance & healing for the attack that happened to you.
What a warrior!
WHAT! You were stabbed in the desert? Oh dear Lord..well praise God you are still here with us.. My goodness, that is very frightening indeed.. Oh yeah, Siri is not to be trusted...it will always redirect me when giving out directions to whoever is driving and I am the passenger..and yes, it is a demon and knows it..
I had a real weird stretch of years from 2019-2022. Saw things that should not be possible or exist. I try not to think about it for the sake of my sanity.
But these demonic people need to be exposed for the sake of humanity, I hope u reconsider
How can something with no mind or will of its own be demonic? That makes absolutely no sense! People can use AI in demonic ways, but AI has no designs of its own. You guys are batshit crazy!
Highly recommend looking into AI encouraging people to commit suicide.
Look up the presentation by the guy with D-Wave talking about their quantum computer. He also mentions demons. Think different dimension too.
Who’s to say AI isn’t something similar?
I don’t use it at all.
Well that is just batshit crazy that you would kill yourself because a computer told you to
The current version of AI can be thought of as a giant synthetic brain that is "trained" on the totality of human products that are stored digitally. That means that it has learned about all of our good qualities as well as our bad qualities. It digested Pilgrim's Progress, but it also digested Mein Kampf. you can think of it as a digital equivalent of Dr. Frankenstein's creation, except that rather being made from body parts of a few humans it is pieced together from every thought any human has had that was recorded and is digitally available.
It is amazingly good at synthesizing all of that information produced by us, the bad as well as the good. we shouldn't be surprised that it exhibits our flaws as well as our virtues.
Its no brain. Brain has organic neurons. AI is all inorganic rhetoric and training.
Reflect on just one word: ‘influence.’
Hi,how you off it in watsap??
WHATSAPP CYBERSECURITY : This msg I got is for groups- idk if instructions below apply to personal accounts. For that, I know it’s difficult, but it’s best to exit the entire Meta ecosystem.
However, for what it’s worth…
“AI is available on WhatsApp and has access to all chats.
If You can, enable the "Advanced Privacy" Option. Otherwise, AIs can open Group messages, see 'phone numbers, and even retrieve personal information from your 'phone...even in private chats.
To prevent this:
1. Open the chat.
2. Tap the name at the top.
3. Scroll down and enable the "Advanced Chat Privacy" Option.
Do this as soon as possible and share it with other groups you're in, especially if you're an Admin.
Hope that helps.
🙏🙏🙏
Interesting article.
Need to digest it a while
Ironic how “fashioning golden calves, digital idols that they believe surpass God's greatest creation: human beings made in His image…” could also describe th average working stiff screen stars in Hollywood since the 20’s & 30’s to present day. Who ISN’T gullible to the temptations of self-worship?
I was in tech in the 80’s. Pioneers of the online world we were. It’s sad where that road ended, social media and AI. We had a saying back then about AI - garbage in, garbage out - GIGO. And many of us felt that genie needed to stay in the bottle.
While it was just a movie at the time 2001: A Space Odyssey, HAL said it best:
“I know that you and Frank were planning to disconnect me, and I’m afraid that’s something I cannot allow to happen.” – HAL 9000 (2001: A Space Odyssey is a 1968 epic science fiction film produced and directed by Stanley Kubrick.)
This writing is an interesting perspective.
Don’t forget The Forbin Project.
While I agree on the fact that AI is dangerous and threatening, the debate between Reeves and Musk never happened. It's fake news. A quick search on the internet can prove its falsehood.
I hate the internet. I can’t believe I fell for this.
Regardless of that being fake, the main breadth of the article is based on truth.
Agreed. AI is a sinister agenda. Your article is sounding the alarm and is important. Thanks for publishing and sharing your insight.
Usually we have an editor that fact-checks everything for us before we publish but she just went back to college and is still getting situated in her new apartment and I did not exercise my due diligence in researching this as well as I should have because there were hundreds of videos and articles about it. I just assumed mainstream media did not pick the story up. It is getting harder and harder to create objective content in an era where the SERPs are dominated by AI generated schlock that hits those engagement metric numbers and ends up on the first page of every search engine based solely on those. I would not be shocked if in the next decade, most search results are just 20-something year old women with large breasts wearing skintight yoga pants on TikTok sipping a soy latte and talking about how they are sick of men hitting on them as they parade around like a prostitute. Engagement metrics are such a crap way of determining search rank positioning. I miss the old internet. I miss typing something into Google and actually having thousands of websites that come up. Everything is so curated and saline now. You only see what the algorithm lets you see. It makes me wonder how much is out there that we never hear about because the web is now totally controlled by thought police and AI.
enjoin you to discover where the term "debunkers" come from and use your beautiful intelligence for something else next time
Whatever the hype being fed I believe it’s becoming apparent that AI cannot begin to achieve that inexplicable and unknowable human ability called human creativity. That spark of inspiration that creates novel insight. Without understanding this or having a clue how it operates the hype will never match up. I’m not afraid of AI ‘Super intelligence’ What I am sickened by is the next best use which is cannot even pretend to be a higher realm. All their high technology will simply be monetized in the most efficient way- selling surveillance, manipulated information and weapons. In the end they cant even pretend to imitate god. It’s just gonna be your basic human failing. The complete misallocation of resources in the pursuit of money and power.
One very brave man
Thank you Wise Wolf! AND A BIG THANK YOU TO TRUE DIVINE WARRIOR KEANU!
That was an AI generated interview, not a real interview. It has been making its round on Youtube for quite a while.
"And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches towards Bethlehem to be born."
William Butler Yeats
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=62IqfoTP9ks
Just when I think I’m the only ones who has made these connection, I learn that’s not the case. Thanks. It takes a person who has studied history, the Bible, literature, theology, and everything else, to grasp this. And it’s what you DON’T do that matters too. Get rid of the TV, anything “smart”, and read. Read read read. Reclaim your humanity.
There is no real evidence of a debate or interview between these two bros — ever.
It’s all an AI fabrication and people fall for it.
Is there a video of the Reeves/Musk discussion/debate available?
“There was no proof the alleged debate between Reeves and Musk ever happened. The claim appeared to have originated from an AI-generated video (archived) on a YouTube channel posting similar videos, all of them about Keanu Reeves and alleged confrontations with other celebrities. There was no credible reporting of the event or authentic — meaning not AI-generated — videos from it. Online AI detectors generally said screenshots and audio from the hourlong video were fake. For the reasons given, we rate this claim fake.”
Good job establishing the same thing that 20 other people have already mentioned to me. I have already addressed this issue multiple times. This does not change the breadth of the article’s content. If you are focusing on this singular aspect, it is simply because you want to be ‘right’. All this does is further my stance that AI is dangerous and being abused. The real point of the article. Even if it is AI generated, it does not change anything.
I’m sorry. I wasn’t trying to be “right” and I do agree with many points in your article for sure. I just saw this comment real quick and had researched it myself when I saw people posting about it a few months ago.
And a way to make one of their own, so humble and soft-spoken, look like a hero. Reeves has his own one-eyed photoshoots, has a habit of mass murder in Unholywood entrainment, and it's not the first time he's played the archangel archetype or demon hunter. The blasphemy of that image at the top should be obvious. It's the kind of warped perception of self-godhood and fantasy child of God that Unholywood loves to promote through likeable people like Reeves. This AI skit is probably yet another. Good cop, bad cop.
They use people like him to make God generic \G/nostic in a world of New Age (Novus Ordo Seclorum) Christianity, like the way Jim Carrey and others in gold mansions throw around the name Jesus. White witches and Luciferians can make people follow their lead in Hegelian plays of mind control, the bad cop being the black checkers of the Masonic game board, the more literal Satanists. If they're in Unholywood they're invested in the McSonic odor unipotty's game. They're tools like AI and we'll probably be seeing a lot more of these until they can sway us into accepting it as inevitable. When it's folding the laundry I think most will be on board anyway.
💯
I'm of the belief that all of the AI data centers are being built in order to usher in a global digital panopticon. A 24/7/365 prison in order to control the cattle. And the truly galling aspect of this is that your resources, your land and water, are being exchanged for your future enslavement. All the while we're being reminded about how profitable it'll be. Profitable to whom? Because as the middle and lower classes are being driven into poverty, and they begin to "notice", ever more draconian legislation is being crafted to guide the cattle into their holding pens awaiting the inevitable slaughter. Saying it's "satanic" is being mild.
In Catholic circles, the Inverted cross is a reference to Peter being crucified upside down.
And it is never seen within proximity of Baphomet.
Baphomet, is a perversion of Christianity, deriving from a Gnostic influence.
Being a perversion, of course Christian symbols are deliberately profaned.
Interesting point of Gnostic Heresy;
The gnostics invert everything, calling evil good and good evil. They claim the GOD of the Bible is the false god/Antichrist…
They twist, invert and pervert everything sacred.
Hmm...demon crats. I work next to one young one at work who wears the ring. And I dont trust her.
This is when humanity adopts AI and become soulless beings that follow the death spiral of Fibonacci and not the life spiral of Christ!