122 Comments
User's avatar
Vepr's avatar

The pompous rich elite maggots will get their due justice eventually. One way or another.

Living in a bunker, and coming out a few years later, IS NOT as pleasant as you might think.

No matter how nice the bunker is.

As problems develop, resources dwindle, no entertainment or social media, and the lack of sunlight takes its toll, many will go insane and/or die slowly.

I just returned from living in a slum in Asia for few weeks.

It's the best way to get a true reality check.

There is nothing more enlightening than to hang out, help, and work with people that HAVE NOTHING but are happy and content. An extra set of skilled construction/trade hands and a small amount of cash goes a long way in an impoverished third world village.

Nobody in the west should ever need counseling or depression meds when they feel depressed or cheated in life. They need to be forced to go live in a third world hell hole until they straighten up and realize how good they have it.

For most people it would only take a couple of days...lol.

🐺The Wise Wolf's avatar

My guess is they intend on spending much of that time in cryogenic suspension or in some virtual reality system. They aren’t just going to be sitting underground suffering that’s for damn sure. The top 10 richest people in the world control more money than the bottom 30% combined.

Vepr's avatar

Its like all these old women trying to freeze their eggs waiting for their perfect, rich, handsome, and successful prince charming...lol

Everyone acts like they will live forever.

The biggest challenge the globalists have in all of their evil plans is enough ELECTRICAL POWER to enable it.

All of this new technology takes an enormous amount of power continuously.

The cascade systems that manufacturers like CAT and KOMATSU use to drop temperatures to -450° F or more use an incredible amount of power.

I feel like God is playing them. Always let them aquire 499 pieces of the 500 piece puzzle so to speak. 🙏

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Oct 12, 2025
Comment deleted
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Oct 12, 2025
Comment deleted
Charles's avatar

Wrong. Using contorted logic too (read first section when you suggest telling people nukes aren’t real so they aren’t ready, when 99.9% of people believe they are real and do believe it is an existential threat)

Nukes are fake. Same as viruses. Same as climate change. It is all a con to control us, this one enveloped in the world stage of Russian and China vs the US. All fake

Now, that doesn’t mean they can’t use other means to create this wasteland. They can still create this scenario with other means. We’ve seen what they can do on 9/11. No nukes involved. Some type of energy weapon dustified 8+ buildings (this isn’t a typo. If you don’t know there were more than 7 buildings affected, you don’t know enough). Who knows what other weapons they have. But nukes with “radioactive fallout”. A bunch of nonsense. Also, easier methods could be used to “reset” societies. Just think of our reliance on the electric grid or communication lines, or the banking system. All of these infrastructure systems are critical and if messed with could lead us down a “fallout” path. No need for nukes. What they could do is mess with these infrastructure systems and *then* tell you it was nukes. Put a bunch of AI videos of nukes out and use whatever tech they have to simulate it and wham, you got people still believing the nonsense geopolitcal “rivalries” out there were the cause of the “fallout”. Nevermind no radioactive fallout will ever be detected. Just like Hiroshima is a beautiful green bustling city just months after its “nuke event”.

In conclusion. No. Stop propagandizing people. Fusion in the sun doesn’t prove fission *chain reactions* (which are different from what happens in a nuclear reactor: duh, it doesn’t explode, it’s just really hot) bombs are real

🐺The Wise Wolf's avatar

What would be the point of 'faking' atomic bombs if you have access to other technology that will achieve the same purpose? Does it even matter? Are 10,000 high-yield, thermobaric dirty bombs less dangerous than 100 atomic bombs that would produce the same effect?

My ex-girlfriend is half-Japanese. Her Great-grandmother was from Hiroshima. She lived through the attack. Hearing people like you claim Hiroshima was a 'beautiful green bustling city just months after its nuke event' just shows people like you will believe anything they are told as long as it is some popular Youtube or Tik Tok influencer saying it.

Charles's avatar

The point of the nukes story is to have an existential threat that depends on fake international geopolitical rivalries. The truth is they have been using the nukes story to cement the fake international rivalries: USSR vs west. “Cuba missile crisis”. China vs US. Israel vs rest of middle east. “Iran can’t be allowed to have nukes”, etc. they could use whatever they want for these fake narratives. They settled for something that means “the total destruction of civilized society”. A bunch of bs. The point is to keep people scared

You do make a good point. Does it even matter? Could they use something else that is actually real for this narrative? I think they could. So I don’t know if the fact that nukes are fake matters that much.

What I do know is that if people see through the nukes lie, they’ll understand that the international politics war games are all fake. It’s all bs to keep people divided and controlled

wrt to Hiroshima, The nukes story is that radioactive fallout decimates the place for a very long time. So why do we see all these pictures of a half rebuilt Hiroshima just months after the event? Certainly if fallout were a problem, all the people around wouldn’t have been able to rebuild all this a mere months after the event: see the pics here https://www.life.com/history/hiroshima-portraits-of-survivors/ They would have had to leave the place deserted for longer than just 24 months. I have not seen any evidence that Hiroshima’s damage was any different from the other 100+ Japanese cities that got decimated by the US, and iF I’m not shown enough evidence for a unicorn, I won’t believe in one

Source:

https://www.life.com/history/hiroshima-portraits-of-survivors/

🐺The Wise Wolf's avatar

Fatman and Little Boy were detonated 2000 feet above Nagasaki and Hiroshima. That is why the radiation dissipated rapidly. The purpose was to cause maximum destruction - which is done through airborne detonation. It would have not served a tactical purpose to turn both cities into irradiated hellscapes for decades. The United States wanted Japan to become an industrial center in Asia. We needed a loyal ally in the area and that is what we got.

I find it odd that so many people believe in ‘Ancient Aliens’ and pre-flood technology but then claim that nukes are fake even though they are mentioned in ancient Sumerian epics and Indian texts. Oppenheimer himself once said publicly that he did not ‘invent’ atomic weapons, he ‘rediscovered’ them.

Charles's avatar

I don’t know if you missed it, but all the evidence points to the damage in Hiroshima and Nagasaki being the same as the other 100+ Japanese cities that were decimated by the US…

This “maximum damage” that you talk about, didn’t bring down any of the steel and concrete structures, especially the famous commercial exhibition hall, which was the *closest* to the “bomb”. It didn’t even destroy the narrow 3 way bridge next to the commercial hall. I’ve been there and travelled the area extensively. I’ve never even seen anyone attempt to say that the nuclear fallout caused some damage “over there rather than over here”. You’re falling for the propaganda. Naming bombs is also not a thing. That’s another part of the propaganda to cement it in your brain

Again. Show me the evidence that a unicorn exists and I’ll be like “ok I can see a unicorn being a thing”. Show me the evidence that the damage in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was anything special, please. I’ve been waiting a while because no one ever wants to make that case… just compare those two cities to the other Jap cities and you’ll see what I mean. This is about real life evidence, not about stories where they name bombs some stupid names.

I just supplied evidence that Hiroshima was partially rebuilt in 1947, which means people in 1946 were up and about in Hiroshima. Your claim that the “bomb’s” radiation went somewhere else is countered by the observed evidence that there was damage in the city and people were burned. If the bomb hits the city, the “nuclear blast” hit them, therefore the radiation hit, therefore there should be a fallout in the area. There wasn’t

🐺The Wise Wolf's avatar

You've been to Hiroshima. Good. That means you saw the Genbaku Dome (the "commercial exhibition hall" you mentioned) still standing. You think that disproves nuclear weapons. It actually proves them.

Here's why you're wrong, backed by physics and Japanese testimony.

The Airburst Pattern

Little Boy detonated 600 meters above Hiroshima, not on the ground. This matters enormously. An airburst creates a specific damage pattern that's completely different from conventional bombing.

The blast wave travels downward and outward. Directly underneath the detonation point (the hypocenter), the force is mainly vertical compression. This is why the Genbaku Dome's walls survived while the roof collapsed. The building experienced massive downward pressure but relatively less lateral force. Structures directly below an airburst often survive partially intact while everything around them is obliterated.

The T-shaped Aioi Bridge you mention? It was the aiming point, almost directly under the blast. Same principle. Vertical force, partial survival.

Move outward from the hypocenter, and the lateral blast wave destroys everything. Within 2 kilometers, wooden structures were completely vaporized. The damage radius and pattern are completely different from conventional bombing, which creates localized destruction in multiple separate zones.

Dr. Yoshio Nishina, Japan's leading nuclear physicist, examined Hiroshima three days after the bombing. His report to the Japanese military: "Without a doubt, this was an atomic bomb."

Radiation Science You're Ignoring

You claim people rebuilding in 1946 proves no radiation. Wrong. It proves you don't understand isotope half-lives.

Nuclear fission creates dozens of radioactive isotopes. Most have extremely short half-lives. Iodine-131 (major health threat) has an 8-day half-life. After 80 days, it's virtually gone. Cesium-137 (30-year half-life) was present but at levels that allowed limited occupation with precautions.

More importantly: airburst detonations produce significantly less fallout than ground bursts because the fireball doesn't touch the ground and suck up material to irradiate. Most fission products went into the upper atmosphere and dispersed. The radiation that hit the ground came primarily from the initial gamma and neutron burst, not from lingering fallout.

Survivors could return relatively quickly because the short-lived isotopes decayed and the long-lived ones were present in smaller quantities than a ground burst would produce.

Japanese Testimony

Michihiko Hachiya, director of Hiroshima Communications Hospital, kept a diary. August 6, 1945: "The hour was early; the morning still, warm, and beautiful. Shimmering leaves, reflecting sunlight from a cloudless sky, made a pleasant contrast with shadows in my garden... Then a tremendous flash of light cut across the sky... I was thrown to the ground... timbers and plaster rained down... when I tried to rise, I discovered that I was completely naked."

Akiko Takakura was 20, 300 meters from the hypocenter: "There was no sound. I felt something strong. It was terribly intense. I felt colors. It wasn't heat. You can't really say it was yellow, and it wasn't blue. At that moment I thought I would be the only one who would die."

These aren't descriptions of conventional bombing. Flash of light brighter than the sun. No sound initially (because the light travels faster). Thermal radiation so intense it felt like "colors."

The Science You're Demanding

You want evidence the damage was "special"? Here it is:

Thermal radiation at ground zero: 3,000-4,000 degrees Celsius. Roof tiles fused. Granite discolored. Shadows of vaporized humans permanently burned into concrete. Show me conventional bombing that does that.

Dr. Stafford Warren led the medical team studying Hiroshima. His report documented radiation injuries completely unknown in conventional warfare: bone marrow destruction, catastrophic white blood cell loss, hair loss in specific patterns, subcutaneous hemorrhaging.

The Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission (later the Radiation Effects Research Foundation) has followed survivors for 75+ years. They documented radiation-induced cancers appearing decades later at rates far exceeding background. Conventional bombing doesn't cause leukemia spikes 10 years later.

Why Other Cities Looked Similar (But Weren't)

You claim Hiroshima looked like Tokyo or Osaka after firebombing. Surface similarity, completely different mechanism.

Tokyo firebombing (March 9-10, 1945): 1,665 tons of bombs dropped by 279 B-29s over several hours. Created firestorm. 100,000+ dead.

Hiroshima (August 6, 1945): One bomb. One plane. One instant. 70,000+ dead immediately. The entire city center destroyed in a fraction of a second.

The Japanese could distinguish them. Prime Minister Suzuki's cabinet knew immediately this was different. Foreign Minister Togo: "Such a weapon has the power to make the continuation of the war impossible."

That's why Emperor Hirohito cited "a new and most cruel bomb" in his surrender broadcast. Not "more bombing like we've experienced." New. Different. War-ending.

The Physics Doesn't Lie

You claim naming bombs is propaganda. Little Boy and Fat Man weren't marketing. They were project designations. Little Boy was a uranium gun-type device. Fat Man was a plutonium implosion design. Different physics, different engineering, both worked.

The Manhattan Project employed 130,000 people across multiple sites. Los Alamos, Oak Ridge, Hanford. They produced enriched uranium-235 and plutonium-239. They built and tested the weapons. Trinity test in New Mexico, July 16, 1945, left a crater and trinitite (fused sand). That's physical evidence sitting in the desert right now.

You can measure residual cesium-137 and strontium-90 in Hiroshima soil today. You can detect it with a Geiger counter. It's there. It's real. It's measurable.

Your Logical Failures

You say "show me evidence of a unicorn." Wrong analogy. Unicorns have zero physical evidence. Nuclear weapons have:

Measurable isotopes in bomb sites

Documented radiation injuries

Surviving structures showing airburst damage patterns

Thermal shadows on concrete

Japanese government acknowledgment

Survivor testimony

Scientific measurements

Functioning reactors using the same physics

You're not a skeptic. You're denying observable reality because it doesn't match your expectations of what nuclear weapons "should" look like.

The Genbaku Dome standing is evidence FOR the bomb, not against it. The rapid rebuilding is evidence FOR short-lived isotopes, not against radiation. The similarity to other bombed cities is superficial and ignores the mechanism and scale.

You've been to Hiroshima. Next time, visit the Peace Memorial Museum. Read the survivor accounts. Look at the photographs of thermal shadows. Examine the melted roof tiles. Talk to the researchers at the Radiation Effects Research Foundation.

Or keep believing that 130,000 Manhattan Project workers, the entire Japanese government, decades of nuclear physics, and 75 years of measurable radiation are all lying to you.

The physics doesn't care what you believe. The isotopes are still there.

Note to anyone reading this: This guy has never been to Japan. He is lying. This is what EVERY SINGLE ONE of these 'nukes are not real' guys say. They are being paid to push this bullshit narrative. I guarantee this guy is a Freemason.

Charles's avatar

“Little Boy detonated 600 meters above Hiroshima, not on the ground. This matters enormously. An airburst creates a specific damage pattern that's completely different from conventional bombing.”

It’s completely different huh? So why is the damage in Hiroshima and Nagasaki pretty much the same as in the other 100+ decimated Jap cities?

“Structures directly below an airburst often survive partially intact while everything around them is obliterated.”

You clearly haven’t seen the images of the rest of Hiroshima then. Everything around them [what’s directly below an airburst] was not ‘obliterated’. Here. Skim through this album of the aftermath of the ‘nuke’: https://www.icp.org/browse/archive/collections/hiroshima-ground-zero-1945-may-20-august-28-2011

There you can see hundreds of concrete + steel buildings standing. No ‘everything around them is obliterated.’

Another example: https://www.atomicarchive.com/media/photographs/hiroshima/image-23.html

There you see the same thing. Concrete+steel structures standing, not “everything around them is obliterated” like you claim.

See how evidence is important when making a case?

“The damage radius and pattern are completely different from conventional bombing, which creates localized destruction in multiple separate zones.”

When I compare with other destroyed Jap cities, I see the same patterns. So, to me, this is all yap, zero evidence.

“Shadows of vaporized humans permanently burned into concrete. Show me conventional bombing that does that.

High heat fire would have the same effect. If a person is lying being burned to death in a high heat environment, the ground around him will discolor, but the ground beneath him will not: fire shadow. Also, there aren’t many pictures of this alleged effect. I’ve only seen the couple on steps, the alleged pipeline shadow, and the infamous bridge one. The one that looks most convincing is the one of the bridge. And to be honest, I can’t explain that one. It does look akin to what would happen if the story is true. But then again, where are the hundreds of photos of this effect on the rest of the cities where concrete blocked the path of the photons and created a discoloration? Very sus if those pics aren’t available. Perhaps you can point me to a gallery where we can see this same bridge railling shadow effect made by other structures? That’d be great.

“You claim Hiroshima looked like Tokyo or Osaka after firebombing. Surface similarity, completely different mechanism.

Tokyo firebombing (March 9-10, 1945): 1,665 tons of bombs dropped by 279 B-29s over several hours. Created firestorm. 100,000+ dead.

Hiroshima (August 6, 1945): One bomb. One plane. One instant. 70,000+ dead immediately. The entire city center destroyed in a fraction of a second.

The Japanese could distinguish them. Prime Minister Suzuki's cabinet knew immediately this was different. Foreign Minister Togo: "Such a weapon has the power to make the continuation of the war impossible."

That's why Emperor Hirohito cited "a new and most cruel bomb" in his surrender broadcast. Not "more bombing like we've experienced." New. Different. War-ending.”

This could very easily just be propaganda. Why do you assume you are being told the truth? Stop believing the people in power just because they are people in power. Here in the real world, we deal with evidence.

In this link you can see evidence of images of various cities decimated by the US. They all look very similar. Hiroshima doesn’t look special to me at all: http://www.zephaniah.eu/index_htm_files/Why%20Explosive%20Nuclear%20Devices%20May%20Not%20Exist.pdf

“You claim naming bombs is propaganda. Little Boy and Fat Man weren't marketing.”

Yes it is marketing

“The Manhattan Project employed 130,000 people across multiple sites. Los Alamos, Oak Ridge, Hanford.”

And US intelligence employs hundreds of thousands today, and they produce psyops left and right.

“Measurable isotopes in bomb sites”

If you were faking the damn thing, you would also fake reading these measurements wouldn’t you? Was there a reliable independent study on these measurements? Of course not..

“Documented radiation injuries”

Michael Palmer contends the so-called radiation injuries were more consistent with napalm injuries: https://odysee.com/@lancewdetrick:b/IA---Michael-Palmer-on-Hiroshima-and-the-faked-atomic-bombing---Jerm-Warfare:8

“Surviving structures showing airburst damage patterns”

All cities look very similar to me: http://www.zephaniah.eu/index_htm_files/Why%20Explosive%20Nuclear%20Devices%20May%20Not%20Exist.pdf

“Thermal shadows on concrete”

Already addressed this point, and I’m open to finding more photographs of this effect. There aren’t many circulating widely.

“Japanese government acknowledgment”

Why do you put trust in these people? For all you know they were just deceived by the propaganda too. They could have also been saying whatever the US wanted them to say under some threat. There are so many possibilites for this. This is probably the weakest part of your spiel and shows your lack of critical thinking.

“Survivor testimony”

Same thing. If the media was already controlled and most people died, nothing would be published against the narrative they wanted to push. They were playing spy games all over Europe and the US, but suddenly everything was truthful and honest in Japan? Give me a break

“Scientific measurements”

Already addressed this

“Functioning reactors using the same physics”

No, they don’t do nuclear fission “chain reactions” in functioning reactors. Things aren’t exploding in chain reactions in nuclear plants. It’s just heat emanating from the radioactive source. No chain reactions there, which is what nukes are supposed to be.

“You're not a skeptic. You're denying observable reality because it doesn't match your expectations of what nuclear weapons "should" look like.”

I came with evidence and analysis, you just bring claims and a lack of awareness of the games these psycopaths in charge play

“The Genbaku Dome standing is evidence FOR the bomb, not against it. The rapid rebuilding is evidence FOR short-lived isotopes, not against radiation. The similarity to other bombed cities is superficial and ignores the mechanism and scale.”

Already addressed the hundreds of other standing concrete structures which were not part of the “everything around them is obliterated” which you specifically claimed. Sure, Hiroshima’s radiation is supposed to be short-lived, I’ll give you that. Ok, then. Show me the scale and compare it to Tokyo, where the damage appears to be even larger

“You've been to Hiroshima. Next time, visit the Peace Memorial Museum. Read the survivor accounts. Look at the photographs of thermal shadows. Examine the melted roof tiles. Talk to the researchers at the Radiation Effects Research Foundation.”

I did, and I’m linking to proof that I visited

“Or keep believing that 130,000 Manhattan Project workers, the entire Japanese government, decades of nuclear physics, and 75 years of measurable radiation are all lying to you.”

Like I said, there are hundreds of thousands of intelligence agents, and these people produce psyop after psyop after psyop, creating fake event after fake event. That’s why we have to go to basics and look at the evidence, not whatever bs they spout out of their mouthes.

“Note to anyone reading this: This guy has never been to Japan. He is lying. This is what EVERY SINGLE ONE of these 'nukes are not real' guys say. They are being paid to push this bullshit narrative. I guarantee this guy is a Freemason.”

bwahahahahahahahahah, so you resort to calling me a liar and a Freemason? lololol

Ok, here. Evidence that I was there. I lived in Japan my dude. These are pictures that I or my wife took when we were there. Try reverse searching those images, you won’t find exact matches. They all came from my or my wife’s camera. There you can see I spent time in the museum, by the peace park or w/e it’s called, having some Hiroshima style okonomiyaki, going to the Miyajima island or w/e it’s called. I have fond memories in Hiroshima. I spent a Birthday there in a cute Italian restaurant right on the bank of the river by one of the bridges. Can’t wait to be back

https://postimg.cc/gallery/ZScN41k/dd8352ed

Anway, good luck calling random people Freemasons. That’ll show them! Don’t forget to believe your local State and take the next jab for the next non-existent ‘virus’!

Cheerio

Mooon's avatar

What is most sickening is that the Japanese had surrendered and they dropped the bombs on them anyway.

Brian Murphy's avatar

Fascinating exchange. Well done for thrashing it out (I will miss the minutes from my life).

I am left wondering if a more appropriate title for the essay would be:

“Someone wants you to believe that someone wants you to believe that nukes don’t exist through hyper time-sucking obfuscation and contradiction across all “for” and “against” arguments such that the marks are left none the wiser, retreating instead to heuristics, reductive reasoning and apathy.”

If this is fait accompli, then you are both likely freemasons! 🤡

This nuclear physics PhD also believes nukes are fake…

https://open.substack.com/pub/stevenalexanderyoung

MusicMan's avatar

Here’s my two cents.

From what I’ve read Charles is right

It is and has always been a hoax.

Like everything else they teach us

https://ia803201.us.archive.org/6/items/8d-0de-2/8d0de2.pdf

Texas Arcane's avatar

My precise reasoning on the subject. Does it matter if they fake a nuke with a conventional thermobaric weapon loaded with dirty cobalt? Not to you if you're on the receiving end. How would anybody ever know, since the effects will be the exact same?

🐺The Wise Wolf's avatar

Exactly. Why argue about what caliber the bullet that blew Kennedy’s brains out? The point is his head got splattered all over.

Esborogardius Antoniopolus's avatar

Man. Nukes are real. People fucking study physics and do experiments with chain reaction at the universities labs. The only fucking difference between those experiments and a bomb is the amount and concentration of fissile material.

Have you ever been in a nuclear power plant? I did, and it fucking generates loads of steam to run gigantic turbines that generate mother fucking lots of electricity. Again, is the same principle: a chain reaction of nuclear fission. But a controlled fission reaction. You can fucking study things by yourself in a public library, you can buy radioactive samples and Geiger counters. You can still buy photographic film, keep it close to a radioactive source in a dark box, still closed, and send it to be developed and you will see the film will have been exposed. You can do a lot of experiments that you’ll easily find mostly in physics books from the 60s and all of those will prove to you that radioactivity is real and that the only reasonable theory for it coming from those materials is nuclear fission

The people saying those absurdities are either scammers that want your money or agents for the globalists themselves.

Don’t be a fucking patsy.

Evie's avatar

I agree Charles. The Satanic world order is all about fear and lies. This tactic has always been used all of the time so why would atomic bombs be any different? There’s a good you tube video that proves it’s fake.

Elaine Seinfeld's avatar

WORD...Dr Tom Cowan explains the "no nukes"....

User's avatar
Comment removed
Oct 12, 2025
Comment removed
🐺The Wise Wolf's avatar

You people clearly never graduated high school.

You have no understanding of nuclear physics at all. Can you even spell 'isotope'?

Esborogardius Antoniopolus's avatar

Half of those “people” probably are AI bots from some intelligence service, designed to feed the psyop and destroy naive people that have started questioning the world order.

Texas Arcane's avatar

You just described the exact chain of reasoning that caused me to form VAULT-CO over 24 years ago. I thought the common man needed a civil defense program of his own, perhaps one so efficient it could counter the trillions spent by the elites on their own shelters.

So far I have a recipe for vanilla pudding.

But much, much more is coming very soon.

Thanks for confirming my ideas are sound. You are the first person in 24 years to do so.

🐺The Wise Wolf's avatar

Rational, intelligent minds are rare my friend. We are a dying breed.

🐺The Wise Wolf's avatar

btw who do you think really killed JFK? i was just reading your bio on your website so I am certain you have been down this rabbit hole yourself. i have it narrowed down to the secret service actually being the enforcement arm of the rothschild banking cartel having him killed because he intended to go on silver backed dollar standard (which if that had happened, we’d all be millionaires right now…) OR that his speech about a ‘secret society’ having infiltrated government and was taking it over within that was delivered at the Ritz in front of a room full of the richest and most powerful people on the planet, without him realizing half of them were part of this secret society, had him killed OR and most likely - a combination of the two. the official story is a pile of horseshit and anyone with a brain has to know that.

Full Name's avatar

Seems fitting I should encounter this piece at the precise moment it has "33" comments...

Nick Griffin's avatar

Very well put. More than a decade ago I was telling audiences that our standard of living was devaluing the experience of the elite amd that this was the key reason underlying their Net Zero assault on our living standards.

Nuclear way is the same trick on acid.

🐺The Wise Wolf's avatar

These aristocratic families have ALWAYS wanted that power they lost back. They are working behind the scenes to get it by any means necessary. Our grandfathers and great-grandfathers fought and bled to get what we take for granted and now these 'liberals' hand it over to the human refuse they brought in for the singular purpose of breaking cohesion of the working class. The people that should be united are now fighting amongst themselves while the elite consolidate and expand their power and wealth to unprecedented since Ancient Roman levels. We are headed towards another Dark Age if we do not stand up and demand they sit back down before they wake a pride of sleeping lions with real sharp claws and even sharper teeth. No amount of high tech weaponry could ever stop the white man when he's awakened... nothing but nukes and they will not hesitate to use them if they are going to lose.

Garfield's avatar

I have noticed over my lifetime of 70-some years, the aristocratic families have lost their entitlement. Now everyone can choose to travel the world, some can even choose first-class. Any man/woman can create a business; an idea that can manifest itself into successful wealth...the American Dream. The ‘Commoner’ can be successful enough to buy an estate right next door to the elite-class entitled, inter-generational inheritor. We working-class plebs are pissing them off to no end, we are entrenching on their estates and their haughtily exclusive ways of life.

Despite what MSM wants to sell us today, what we have here is not a political ‘Left versus Right’ battle amongst us citizens of the world. What we truly have is an ‘Up versus Down’ battle, humanity against these global elites. We must not allow these degenerate elites (they intermarry) to divide and conquer us by pitting one side against one another. Rather we should be focusing on our fight against these damned perverted satanic elites who want to rule the world in their image of satanism, at our expense and in our belief in God, and the loss of our earthly experience.

I hope to witness their downfall before I die, and yet I do not know how this will occur, nor do I know what part I will play; I await the opportunity, with the blessing of God.

Kaedyn Nedopak 🏳️‍⚧️🏳️‍🌈's avatar

I have been on this planet for many lifetimes, and it’s always the same. You’re speaking the truth as always! This is exactly what I see coming for the reasons you’ve explained. It has been driving me bonkers how much propaganda they’re shoving into people’s faces to ignore this future possibility. Here I am trying to be prepared for a year of no power, but I don’t have a bunker so… !

Peebo Preboskenes's avatar

The original Bikini islanders were forcibly relocated starting in 1946 due to nuclear testing by the United States, and they have not been able to return permanently because of ongoing radioactive contamination.

We have hydrogen bombs that, if thousands explode (or perhaps just hundreds), the fallout and debris that will rise into the atomosphere will poison the earth for centuries. A single Satan missile from Russia, with its dozen plus individually guided warheads, could take out the New York tri-state area. Their Poseidon torpedoes could wipe out the eastern and western seaboards with irradiated water that will poison the earth for thousands of years. If you think the interior is safe just look at all the siloes and nuclear energy plants littered across the country. Now imagine the siloes are hit before or after the missiles fly. Then imagine the nuclear plants melting down over the next months.

The Russians have over 5,500 warheads alone. We have roughly equal that number. How many does China have? North Korea?

Nuclear holocaust will kill the earth. Some cockroaches may survive.

Rob's avatar

Nuclear weapons are very real and will be used to burn this harlot in one hour as the merchants of the earth watch from a distance!:

Revelation 18:15-19  The merchants of these things, who were made rich by her, shall stand afar off for the fear of her torment, weeping and mourning;  (16)  saying, Woe, woe, the great city, she that was arrayed in fine linen and purple and scarlet, and decked with gold and precious stone and pearl!  (17)  for in one hour so great riches is made desolate. And every shipmaster, and every one that saileth any whither, and mariners, and as many as gain their living by sea, stood afar off,  (18)  and cried out as they looked upon the smoke of her burning, saying, What city is like the great city?  (19)  And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and mourning, saying, Woe, woe, the great city, wherein all that had their ships in the sea were made rich by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.

Please get to know this harlot and come from among her sins!:

https://sumofthyword.com/2021/01/07/mystery-babylon-the-great-and-her-beast/

🐺The Wise Wolf's avatar

I don’t think God needs nukes. Rather, the Dragon is going to use nukes to destroy the world before God can Judge it. That is the sort of thing Satan would do. He’s jealous of God’s power and has spent his entire existence trying to ‘become God’. Fake omnipotence, fake omniscience, false signs and wonders, etc. God doesn’t need technology to destroy the world.

JC's avatar

The Dragon needs to create enough of a facsimile of the real apocalypse such that the Church calls him the Messiah and he can show up the whole charade of faith as fake. Take that, God! Ha!

It would succeed, too, except the Grace of God is at living work.

🐺The Wise Wolf's avatar

This is literally what I think he will do. Everything the Dragon does is to make himself APPEAR TO BE GOD because he knows he is not God and never can be God. All he can do is copy what God has done and his prophets have said and then claim to his moronic followers he is 'God' and all the while PAYING THEM to worship him. That is how these cults operate. He runs the economy. People worship money. It's simple to steer billions into worshiping some false fallen angel that was kicked out of Paradise when you are paying them to do it.

JC's avatar

Well it's more than that: satanists who have left, and arrogant ones who have not, have confessed the plan has been to trigger a series of wars, the third of which of such destructiveness that the people will be ready for ANY messiach (spelling intentional). And, that interpretive edits to Western Bibles are to support a synthetic Jewish state that will be placed into conflict resembling prophecy, and trigger that third war.

It plays into certain Judaic cults that believe they can force the messiach by fomenting crisis upon the Jewish people.

Rob's avatar

Revelation 17:16-18  And the ten horns which thou sawest, and the beast, these shall hate the harlot, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and shall burn her utterly with fire.  (17)  For God did put in their hearts to do his mind, and to come to one mind, and to give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God should be accomplished.  (18)  And the woman whom thou sawest is the great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.

Lar Sulrich's avatar

Yes, God does not need nukes, or abortion, or pornography, or feminism - but I suppose God cannot bring Himself to inflict bad on the world; He can only let Satan do the dirty work.

Yet the goal is goodness. All this has one objective, as my priest with a knack for the pithy said: This is all about bringing people to faith and repentance. Your publicizing these things is contributing to that goal.

Why it is not different is beyond my ability to reason. Don't ask me how God's plan works.

John Visher's avatar

you might be a wise wolf but on this subject you cry wolf. you may also believe man walked on the moon. the bigger the lie the more people tend to believe it. nukes, moon walk (not our good man Michael Jackson's), holocaust, 9/11 when two fake planes knocked down 3 real buildings -- some of the giant lies people in the mainstream accept at face value. maybe oppenhiemer was a psycho hallucinating ashkenazi. oi dear!

James Bean's avatar

Yeah you lost me at "the sun is 93 milliom miles away".

Elias Lumen's avatar

Now consider the possibility that belief in nuclear weapon is what manifests nuclear war.

Not believing in nuclear weapons means NOT believing in nuclear war.

The degree of belief is what manifests reality.

Lar Sulrich's avatar

Also, AI drones, trained on first-person-shooter video games and FPV drones, will mercilessly hunt the survivors.

Those orchestrating all this are people, but they are acting according to the devil's instructions. No ordinary human minds come up with such machinations. The devil only wants to destroy the Creation, purely out of spite for God.

🐺The Wise Wolf's avatar

My guess is it will be entertainment for those in the bunkers with the drones being controllable. like a game show. Murder the Survivors! Win big prizes!

Lar Sulrich's avatar

Ha ha ha (laughs weakly)

Like the Elites in Squid Game, watching and speculating on the contestants.

Sober Christian Gentleman's avatar

I do not believe in nuclear bombs...I will have to make a podcast to explain it...

Kathleen Connor's avatar

You may indeed be wise, Wolf.

Lar Sulrich's avatar

Your thesis about nuclear power having its origins in bomb making is sound. Nuclear reactors were initially created to produce plutonium, the essence of the initial implosion-type nuclear weapons. The weapons projects predated electricity generation by about a decade.

🐺The Wise Wolf's avatar

This is literally fiction. The author says so in the first paragraph.

"The document does not exist. It was conceived as a thought experiment."

The Silver Strand Institute is made up. The 1943 memo is made up. This is creative writing, not evidence.

Want actual evidence?

Go to Hiroshima or Nagasaki. Ask the survivors if atomic bombs exist. Ask about the radiation burns, the sickness, the cancer rates that persisted for decades.

Seismological stations worldwide have recorded hundreds of nuclear tests. Nuclear power plants use the same fission physics right now. The IAEA independently verifies this stuff across multiple countries.

Thousands of scientists, doctors, and survivors across 80 years all confirm the same reality.

If you're using a fictional thought experiment to contradict people who survived atomic bombings, you're not being skeptical. You're just ignoring reality.

Doreen's avatar

It's about fictional premises. How the thought experiment is used to psychologically manipulate/control human beings and pit man against man.

Covid premise: a world where nanoparticles transporting m-RNA function perfectly [maim and kill] without proof SARS-CoV2/disease causing viruses exist.

Climate premise: a world where carbon taxes and limiting human access to nature function perfectly without proof of unnatural climate warming.

Left-Right premise: a world where electoral voting functions perfectly [consent] without proof of authenticity nor good governance.

God premise: a world where Satan who is the god of this world | 2 Corinthians 4:4 [bible] functions perfectly without proof humans are the pearl within the cosmic shell.

https://cosmiconion.substack.com/p/the-mirror-of-god

🐺The Wise Wolf's avatar

Well I'm convinced! Fission and Fusion do not exist! We live in a simulation! The moon is made of green cheese! The female orgasm is not a myth! Huzzah! And BTW that guy uses AI to write everything on his Substack. He even uses ChatGPT when he's chatting with you...

Doreen's avatar

Thank you for the ChatGPT heads up.

Lily-Rose Dawson's avatar

Hey now if you weren’t such a beta cuck you might actually be able to figure out what the clitoris is for bossman.

🐺The Wise Wolf's avatar

shaddup lily. i was dating models when you were still in in grade school. proud plus size BBW models!