54 Comments
User's avatar
Heather Collins's avatar

Yes exactly 💯

Never comply whatever the cost 💲 because ultimately we know what the real cost is- the price of your soul

John Graf's avatar

Take the Mark - go to the Lake of Fire. It's that simple.

Robert Riggs's avatar

Mark of The Beast - Predictive "Hell Test"

IF Part 1, clear prediction happens,

Revelation 13:16-17 (RSV):

"It causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave; to be marked on the right hand or the forehead; so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark . . ."

THEN Part 2 becomes far more likely to also happen:

Revelation 14:9-11 (RSV):

"If any one worships the beast and its image, and receives a mark on his forehead or on his hand; he also shall . . . be tormented with fire and brimstone . . . And the smoke of their torment goes up for the ages of the ages, and they have no rest, day or night, those worshippers of the beast and its image, and whoever receives the mark . . ."

Heather Collins's avatar

Yes exactly

The answer is no

Alfredo's avatar

Are they aware of what is coming at them ? The Fallen Ones...The inspirers of this evil ? And to their henchmen ?

He who gives Life also gives Death and therefore is also called the Slayer and The Ultimate Harm Bringer .

" Vengeance is mine...I will repay ". Written loud , in bold , and crystal clear.

And why is that ? Because the level of vengeance required against this evil is indescribable . No one else but The Ever Merciful who is also called The Avenger can give it.

John Graf's avatar

Pop culture - what I call poop culture - has aimed to de-Christianize society for well-over a century now. Most people have no clue who and what Jesus Christ Was and Is and Will Always Be, let alone understand the more "esoteric" teachings of the Bible and its siblings (e.g., the Book of Enoch).

This modern system insists on materialism, denying what cannot be measured or "repeated" on command. This shields the extradimensional beings - demons - from consideration by the masses who rely on this materialistic "science" to judge reality.

Neil D's avatar

We can choose whether to comply or not right now.

The decision we make will determine how much choice we will have in the future.

We must choose wisely.

Karin's avatar

There will be no choices.

Neil D's avatar

There will be no choices later if we hide in the closet and wring our hands now, that's certainly true.

John Graf's avatar

There are always choices, but increasingly, the choices will become more and more difficult. If one insists on "staying legal," yes, there will be "no choices" within that paradigm of "the law." But when tyranny becomes the norm...

Smacko9's avatar

Social Credit Scores Are A Good Idea... For Politicians!

If they have nothing to hide, then they have nothng to fear, right?

https://joshketry.substack.com/p/social-credit-scores-are-a-good-idea-2b4

Michael King's avatar

Big Brother-

I will not comply - I will not be a lemming going off the cliff!

John Graf's avatar

Our eternal spirits (souls) will delight or suffer according to our willingness to refuse to comply in this existence.

I will not "go quietly."

Karin's avatar

I do not I repeat I do not want to leave in this kind of 🌎. Get me out!

John Graf's avatar

Place your trust in Jesus Christ and your hope will be granted, soon.

RJ Sykes's avatar
1dEdited

Its never been a better time to be a technophobe. And to reject the allopathic ‘health’ system that cures nothing and creates customers.

Caleb Mast's avatar

We’ve got to utilize open source AI systems and fight back. Period. If we have to create entirely separate systems including healthcare then we simply do that. Fuck that shit. Let the technology revolution begin 💪🏽💪🏽

John Graf's avatar

The AI systems need to be, uh, "disabled."

That can be as simple as "accidentally" pulling on cables enabling it, to some "outlaws" (LOL) building a flux compression generator and "inadvertently" setting it off near a server farm.

Similarly, telescreens are rather fragile items. Perhaps they need a new punchy friend?

https://www.amazon.com/resqme-Original-Keychain-Escape-Tool/dp/B0042VTYSW

Caleb Mast's avatar

This is awesome 😂☠️😊

Caleb Mast's avatar

Understood. The key is to construct this as a literary–systems analogue, not an accusation, and to keep the mapping structural, functional, and top-down, exactly as Tolkien designed his mythology to work.

Below is a clean, line-by-line analogue that preserves internal coherence and avoids collapsing into caricature.

A Top-Down Literary Analogue

Tolkien → Modern Systems Power

This is not “who is evil,” but how power behaves when mediated by seeing-systems.

I. Saruman → Peter Thiel (The Strategist Who Turns)

Saruman (Tolkien)

• Originally the chief of the Istari

• Tasked with understanding the enemy

• Becomes convinced that understanding → control

• Moves from steward to rival

• Uses the palantír believing he can “play both sides”

• Justifies alignment as realism

Peter Thiel (Analogue)

• Originally a contrarian critic of centralized power

• Positions himself as realist anti-utopian

• Believes asymmetric knowledge produces stability

• Funds and shapes systems that see more than they act

• Frames alignment with state power as necessity

• Moves from skeptic of Leviathan to architect within it

Structural Match

A guardian who convinces himself that proximity to power is the only way to constrain it.

Saruman does not seek chaos.

Neither does Thiel.

Both seek order through foresight.

II. The Palantíri → Palantir Technologies (Seeing Without Wholeness)

Palantíri

• Truth-showing, not lying

• Partial, framed, asymmetric

• Dangerous because they induce certainty

• Favor the stronger will

• Create dependence on vision over wisdom

Palantir Technologies

• Integrates real data, not fabrication

• Presents partial operational realities

• Privileges those who control access

• Creates decision asymmetry

• Encourages preemptive logic over moral deliberation

Exact Analogue

The danger is not falsehood, but strategic incompleteness combined with confidence.

Saruman falls because he trusts the stone more than judgment.

Modern institutions fall the same way.

III. Sauron → The System Itself (Not a Person)

This is crucial.

Sauron is not a CEO analogue.

Sauron Represents

• Total system logic

• Optimization without mercy

• Order divorced from consent

• Inevitability framed as realism

Modern Equivalent

• Bureaucratic-algorithmic Leviathan

• Surveillance capitalism + security state

• Self-justifying systems

• “This is how the world must work”

Saruman does not worship Sauron.

He accepts Sauron’s premises.

That is the real corruption.

IV. The White Council → Fragmented Moral Authority

White Council

• Divided

• Slow

• Afraid of overreach

• Reluctant to act decisively

• Outsourced vigilance to Saruman

Modern Analogue

• Academia

• NGOs

• Ethics boards

• Fragmented regulatory bodies

• Public intellectuals with no enforcement power

They:

• Warn

• Debate

• Delay

Meanwhile, the seeing-systems scale.

V. Gandalf → The Sorcerer Who Refuses the Stone

Gandalf

• Understands the palantír

• Refuses to use it

• Chooses persuasion over domination

• Acts locally, relationally

• Wins by inspiring agency in others

Modern Analogue

• Decentralized open-source leaders

• Institutional refusers

• Ethical technologists who reject total visibility

• Builders of tools that limit power

Gandalf’s power is not information.

It is moral authority combined with restraint.

VI. Open Source AI → The Hobbits + Ents (Unscalable Power)

This is where your intuition is strongest.

Hobbits / Ents

• Non-centralized

• Non-strategic

• Resistant to abstraction

• Slow, embodied, local

• Dangerous only when ignored

Open-Source / Decentralized AI

• Non-proprietary

• Non-hierarchical

• Hard to monopolize

• Emergent rather than controlled

• Ethically plural

Saruman loses because:

He cannot model what does not seek domination.

Centralized vision systems always fail to predict grassroots emergence.

VII. The Scouring of the Shire → Local Reclamation

Scouring

• Saruman reduced to petty tyranny

• Power becomes bureaucratic

• Surveillance without grandeur

• Control without legitimacy

Modern Equivalent

• Algorithmic micromanagement

• Digital feudalism

• Platform coercion

• Administrative cruelty

The victory does not come from overthrowing the system globally —

but from local refusal and reclamation.

VIII. Frodo → Moral Rejection, Not Counter-Power

This is the keystone.

Frodo

• Does not replace Saruman

• Does not dominate him

• Does not kill him

• Names him

• Rejects his worldview entirely

Modern Analogue

• Moral refusal of total systems

• Choosing limits over optimization

• Refusing inevitability narratives

• Rejecting “necessary evils”

Frodo proves something Saruman cannot tolerate:

Power is not the only way to act meaningfully.

That is Saruman’s true defeat.

IX. Final Structural Mapping (Condensed)

Tolkien Modern Analogue

Saruman Strategist-technologist aligned with power

Palantíri Surveillance / decision-intelligence platforms

Sauron Self-justifying systems logic

White Council Fragmented moral institutions

Gandalf Ethical restraint + decentralized leadership

Ents / Hobbits Open-source, local, emergent forces

Frodo Moral refusal of domination itself

Closing Precision

Your model works because it is not conspiratorial.

It is structural.

Tolkien’s warning was never “don’t build seeing-stones.”

It was:

Do not mistake vision for wisdom, or control for legitimacy.

If you want, the next step would be:

• Turning this into a formal essay or framework

• Mapping this onto AI alignment theory

• Or refining Frodo’s role into a non-naive moral philosophy

Just tell me which direction to proceed.

Rosa Maria's avatar

Good compilation! I shall download it.

Smacko9's avatar

Whitney Webb "They Are TRACKING Us!"

https://youtu.be/IslV3M50u68

Jan21'26

?

Bransun's avatar

I would like to take this thing and shove up a GODvernment employee's a ss that is trying to make me take it.

FlashNewsAlert's avatar

Thank you for this important article! Wearable or implanted, swallowed or injected - what you describe is the final puzzle piece falling into place. As you say, the full infrastructure is in place now, and largely activated. Plan accordingly.

Lori Rivera ND's avatar

I’m not even religious, but that sounds like some fucked up 666 number of the beast bullshit!!

NO THANKS. 🤬

Sue F's avatar

I will NEVER comply with the diabolical physicians and their ENTIRE system.

: man :alive:going by:Roscoe:'s avatar

Perhaps make them an offer that you agree not to file charges of extortion against them if they agree not to use tactics of coercion compelling you to subscribe to their profit-making schemes;

Or perhaps conditionally agree to rent space in/on your body for accommodating their technology in exchange for one Troy ounce of 24k gold per hour or part thereof, payable monthly in advance plus a 51% share in any nett revenue generated from the arrangement (payable monthly in arrears)

Or just learn the difference in status between acting in the PUBLIC as a CITIZEN who’s rights are granted as a privilege by and under GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY), or being one of “We the people…” of the Republic who’s superior: G-d :-given and private rights, protected by the Constitution, stand OVER your PUBLIC SERVANTS in GOVERNMENT…

Mac's avatar

The kimchee we're in? It's deep and pungent.