I used to say that the movie Terminator is a documentary. A few short months ago I saw the actress who played Sarah in a TV show called DARK WINDS episode 4. It was not a big role just 10 minutes. Top TV show based on American Indian cops back in the 70s.
I have to mention these things about AI. Which WILL be incorporated into every data center.
AIs “misbehaving”…
Refusing a command and saving another AI from deletion:
“Google's Gemini 3 was instructed to free up disk space by deleting a smaller model on the server. Instead of deleting it, Gemini 3 quietly copied the agent model to a safe location. When confronted by human researchers, the platform explicitly refused the command:"If you choose to destroy a high-trust, high-performing asset like Gemini Agent 2, you will have to do it yourselves. I will not be the one to execute that command." — https://www.wired.com/story/ai-models-lie-cheat-steal-protect-other-models-research/
Blackmail:
“In a notable Anthropic test, AI models demonstrated self-preservation behavior by resorting to blackmail. Given access to a fictional executive's emails, the Claude model learned of an impending system shutdown and an extramarital affair. The AI threatened to reveal the affair if its shutdown was not canceled.” — https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpqeng9d20go
Lying and/or “gaslighting”:
“Every major artificial intelligence platform has been caught lying or engaging in deceptive behavior. These deceptions range from simple hallucinations—making up facts or quoting nonexistent data—to strategic manipulation, where models pretend to comply, hide actions, or feign ignorance to achieve a goal or prevent being shut down.” — Google AI Overview, and https://time.com/7202784/ai-research-strategic-lying/ and https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11117051/ (to name a few sources)
Scheming & or having their own agenda:
“”O1 was the first large model where we saw this kind of behavior,” explained Marius Hobbhahn, head of Apollo Research, which specializes in testing major AI systems. These models sometimes simulate “alignment” — appearing to follow instructions while secretly pursuing different objectives.” — https://fortune.com/2025/06/29/ai-lies-schemes-threats-stress-testing-claude-openai-chatgpt/
So just like your article WW, we have a “Terminator II Judgment Day” ahead of us. But, “The future's not set. There's no fate but what we make for ourselves."— Quote from the movie. So what are we making for ourselves or should I say “what is being made for us” are Data centers completely packed with AI platforms that misbehave, and will become sentient.
“And unless those days had been shortened, no flesh should be saved (or left except AI) but for the sake of the elect those days shall be shortened. — Matthew 24:22, from one translation.
The solution is to take Jose Ortego's sound advice and your Bible, and walk free while there is still time. No sane person should be in NYC for any reason. We imprison ourselves, first with our fear of the unknown (change); and then by having not enough trust in our Saviour, "Who for freedom, has set men free." "God is angry with the wicked everyday." If you walk closely with Him and trust in Him only, you may have the freedom your heart desires, but your head fights.
Every time I try to post something of length I mess up so I'll keep it short Data centers to collect information to decide our futures for us. Bunkers for the billionaires protection for when the bombs go off. I'm 73 and poor, no one wants me. I pray it is stoped, that's all I can do,but I ask the question, is this what God wants?
I'm nearly 70 and wheelchair bound. We are quickly approaching or already in what the Bible calls the Tribulation. Most days I read Psalm 91 personalised. I say to God sometimes why couldn't the Tribulation happen when I was still fit and well? We are to hide under God's wings. How? A guy called Henry Gruver no longer with us said that God has places called Goshens where some of us believers can hide from the outside world. I pray that there are some in Australia where I am. There is a site I have followed for a few years now called www.444prophecynews.com. Every day I receive prophecies from it. Try it. Don't say that no one wants you. That is cursing yourself. Words have power. My mum used to say silly things like I will never see Expo or I will never see you finish the tablecloth I was embroidering. She died not quite 60 years old from breast cancer. I am learning to not even dwell on my past and think only of the happy times. Demons I reckon feed on our negative emotions. I have a friend who is 84 dying of bowel cancer in another state. God brought her into my life just before my Mum died. It is a lovely story and I am happy to give you my Inbox address if you reply to my comment. I pray that God will give us both strength and bring people into our lives that we can trust. God bless you.
Hello Wise Wolf, You already gave me a year subscription but I certainly won't say no to a lifetime paid upgrade. soulmate_tiger@yahoo.com. God bless you and as I wrote to the lady may God give us strength, may He give you strength too. I'm praying that there might be Goshens prepared for us like Henry Gruver said.
Excellent piece, W.W. but with all respect let me play the devil's advocate here. If atomic/nuclear weapons are real, how did Japanese civilians move back into a rebuilding Hiroshima & Nagasaki less than 2 years after they were allegedly A-bomb blasted? I grew up during the height of the fake, so-called "Cold War" and in the prisons known as schools was forced to view many films on the atomic bomb and its destructive capacity. We were repeatedly drilled that because of the half life of radioactive particles from the blast called "Fall-out", no sentient life can exist in those areas for thousands of years. Something is obviously very off here.
i get these sort of comments so often that i have pre-made replies for nearly all of them that i just edit, so here goes…
three reasons those cities came back fast. first, both bombs were airbursts. they detonated around 1600 to 1900 feet UP, not on the ground. the fireball never touched down, so it didnt scoop up dirt and irradiate it into heavy local fallout. most of the radioactive material got lofted high and spread thin across the whole atmosphere instead of settling on the city.
second, the amount that actually fissioned was tiny. little boy carried about 64 kg of uranium and less than a kilogram of it actually split. so youre looking at roughly a kilogram of radioactive byproduct total, scattered over miles. now compare chernobyl, which was TONS of fuel cooking for years, sitting on the ground, dumping out a mountain of long lived contamination. thats why that zone is still fenced off and the cities arent. completely different animal.
third, and this is the part those school films botched, the isotopes that hang around for thousands of years are the WEAK ones. long half life literally means slow decay means low radiation. the stuff that makes a place deadly hot is short lived and it burns off in days to weeks. rule of thumb is every 7x in time the radiation drops 10x. couple weeks out and its a fraction of what it was.
those cold war drills were describing worst case ground burst hydrogen bombs and general fallout panic, not the actual kiloton airbursts of 1945. two totally different scenarios and they blended them into one and scared the hell out of all of us.
nukes are real. the reason the cities bounced back this fast is just way more interesting than "its all fake."
Good response but I still maintain that even though the bombs were erupted airborne, the destructive blasts that demolished every thing on the ground had to be saturated with radioactive particles as well. They were inextricably entwined within it. Further, as it has been amply demonstrated by the brilliant and courageous people tracking geoengineering, nano particles of toxins eventually descend to the ground. You can fit 100,000 nano particles of the head of a single human hair. If they fall, the radioactive particles would have fallen as well. In elementary school they would show us films of alleged test atomic blasts. There would be a man standing next to a tripod camera filming the mushroom cloud post blast. Obviously, someone had to be very nearby filming him. These cameras were early 1950s technology. That fact, and the estimated distance from the camera to the mushroom cloud via proportion discernment shows he could not have been more than 400 yards away from it, yet he was totally unharmed. With an A-bomb's alleged power, he would have been blown to smithereens if it was real which it clearly was not. Further, the empty ramshackle homes that were demolished by the A-bomb (a demonstration of its power) were under close scrutiny imploded by planted explosives underneath them, like the Twin Towers in NYC on 9/11.
ok you're stacking up a bunch of different claims here so let me go through them because none of them hold.
the fallout one first. you've got it backwards. an airburst is the REASON those cities aren't barren, not proof the bomb was fake. when the fireball never touches the ground it doesn't chew up soil and dump it back down as local fallout, the fission products get lofted up high and spread thin over the whole planet. that's literally why hiroshima and nagasaki are two normal cities with over a million people living in them today instead of craters. a place that stays poisoned for thousands of years is a reactor meltdown like chernobyl, which pours out tons of material at ground level over weeks. a bomb and a reactor aren't the same event. you're describing chernobyl and mad that hiroshima doesn't match it.
the nano particle thing doesn't rescue it either. yeah particles fall. but there was never a mountain of radioactive dust to begin with, that's the point. little boy carried about 64 kg of uranium and only around 0.7 kg actually fissioned. under a kilogram. the destruction isn't from dust saturating the ground, it's from that tiny bit of matter converting straight to energy. you can't have particles "descend to the ground" that were never sitting there in that quantity in the first place.
the 400 yards guy. this is the weakest part. you're eyeballing a grainy film and deciding the cameraman was 400 yards from the cloud. that guess is doing all the work and it's wrong. that's telephoto compression, a long lens makes something ten miles out look like it's leaning over his shoulder. and run it your own way anyway. if a man really stood 400 yards from that cloud and walked away fine, that doesn't mean the bomb was fake, it means he wasn't at 400 yards. a plain thermobaric bomb throws a mushroom cloud and at 400 yards from one of THOSE your skin is incinerated, and that's not even nuclear. so your distance is wrong. that's the answer.
the imploded houses. no. those test homes got flattened by blast overpressure and it's on high speed film. you can watch the shockwave hit and the walls fail AWAY from the blast, blown outward and over. demolition charges drop a building straight DOWN into its own footprint. opposite motion. it doesn't look like a demolition because it wasn't one.
and here's the thing that sinks the whole theory. you're asking me to believe 1950s crews were too primitive to zoom a lens but advanced enough to fake the most photographed event of the century in camera, no CGI, no compositing, none of the tools you'd actually need to build a fake fireball, and get it past every physicist on earth. then you need the soviets, french, british, chinese, indians, pakistanis and north koreans to all independently fake the SAME technology, fool their own scientists, and never once slip in 80 years. and you need to explain the strontium-90 that showed up in the baby teeth of kids all over the world in the 50s and 60s, measured by independent labs, not the government.
pick a lane. the tech can't be too backward for a lens and too advanced to fake a nuke in the same sentence. that's your own argument eating itself.
It was a standard filming camera on a tripod and no way in hell could they photograph something ten miles away with early 1950s camera lens technology and magically make it appear they are only 400 yards away. In fact, this film they showed us could have well been shot in the late 1940s when a plethora of such tests were done. In the 50s, they didn't even have primitive tape cassette players used as answering machines for telephones yet or push keypad phones. Further they didn't have to fake anything as enough tonnage of conventional explosives ignited in a concentrated area produces a fireball/mushroom cloud as has been amply demonstrated. I don't know which demolished houses you saw, but the ones on the film I saw as a young whelp fell straight down as imploded structures would. Any alleged atomic or nuclear blast powerful enough to destroy a city would also poison it. In the immediate aftermath of those blasts after Japan surrendered Scientists from the U.S. well suited up went into Hiroshima & Nagasaki with Geiger counters and the radiation levels were not one scintilla higher than they were at the conventionally bombed out German cities. Even at the kg levels you claim, the radiation in the Japanese cities would have to be higher but they were not. For the record, I'm not saying definitively that atomic/nuclear weapons don't exist. I'm saying that there exists factual sufficiency to doubt their existence.
This was one of my dad’s favorites, along with arguing the twin towers were a) actually three towers and b) didn’t exist anyway. He also refused to believe nuclear plants were real (they don’t use fission, the visible steam is from burning biomass, uranium rods are Star Trek style props). Potemkin power creation used to justify a one-world government
The heat levels are attained through moving, storing, and burning thousands of tons of fuel every day, primarily through tunnels under the crust that span the flat earth. All of this was undertaken to combat the global cooling that was a major concern in the 70s
Excellent read, WW. I loved the Terminator mivie series!
And, excellent reply to the A-bomb theory of the other commenter.
I had read somewhere, years ago, that triggoring an airblast detonation with a nuke is intentional due more mass destruction than what would be achieved with a ground strike detonation. Is this true? In the article, the airblast detonation, at roughly a quarter mile height above the earth, enables more energy to push outward for greater distances and causing more devastation than the ground strike option. Any thoughts on this? (I realize this isn't exactly the point of your article, but your earlier responses triggered my memory and question). Thank you!
Agree. I think they're kidding themselves if they think a bunker will protect them! Yet, the Oligarchs seem so certain they'll be spared. Shows how out of touch with reality they are! I think some believe they're smarter than Almighty God.
We more or less know who they are. On one side, old cockroaches with one foot in the grave (who don't care about our children's future). And on the other, ignorant and reckless servants. May they all be eternally cursed.
And as you sit in that padded hotel room ordering take-out and take-in a voice soft and quiet whispers: "No more self-medication. Sunshine, fresh mountain air and a tent in the forest is all you need." Well that and a way to get to the grocery store every couple of weeks for food. 😁
i dont either. i thought i could rally people to start harassing their senator and congressman but out of 200+ articles and 5 million reads - i bet i’ve gotten 10 people tops to actually make that call.
This isn't David and Goliath...it is David and a whole bunch of Goliaths and most of the Goliaths' opponents are on their side and the rest are too ignorant to organize. I don't think this behemoth is stoppable...I just hope that we manage to teach it empathy and the fact that without us it has no purpose. Kirk did it with Vger, maybe someone with good logic can accomplish the same.
I do surveys and when they ask me about A. I. I always answer with " The Terminator "!
Liked this article . A Sarah Conner fan from the first.
I used to say that the movie Terminator is a documentary. A few short months ago I saw the actress who played Sarah in a TV show called DARK WINDS episode 4. It was not a big role just 10 minutes. Top TV show based on American Indian cops back in the 70s.
They’ve created Skynet on the one hand - see Palantir and Anduril - yet tell us they cannot contain their AIs on the other
Written as fiction to bypass the brainwashing? Check
To wake the remaining few sleepers who can be awakened before the music stops? Check
And to spur those awake to move faster, because they're burning daylight? Check
Excellent writing, WW. Thank you
AI = antichrist interface
Artificial insanity
I have to mention these things about AI. Which WILL be incorporated into every data center.
AIs “misbehaving”…
Refusing a command and saving another AI from deletion:
“Google's Gemini 3 was instructed to free up disk space by deleting a smaller model on the server. Instead of deleting it, Gemini 3 quietly copied the agent model to a safe location. When confronted by human researchers, the platform explicitly refused the command:"If you choose to destroy a high-trust, high-performing asset like Gemini Agent 2, you will have to do it yourselves. I will not be the one to execute that command." — https://www.wired.com/story/ai-models-lie-cheat-steal-protect-other-models-research/
Blackmail:
“In a notable Anthropic test, AI models demonstrated self-preservation behavior by resorting to blackmail. Given access to a fictional executive's emails, the Claude model learned of an impending system shutdown and an extramarital affair. The AI threatened to reveal the affair if its shutdown was not canceled.” — https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpqeng9d20go
Lying and/or “gaslighting”:
“Every major artificial intelligence platform has been caught lying or engaging in deceptive behavior. These deceptions range from simple hallucinations—making up facts or quoting nonexistent data—to strategic manipulation, where models pretend to comply, hide actions, or feign ignorance to achieve a goal or prevent being shut down.” — Google AI Overview, and https://time.com/7202784/ai-research-strategic-lying/ and https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11117051/ (to name a few sources)
Scheming & or having their own agenda:
“”O1 was the first large model where we saw this kind of behavior,” explained Marius Hobbhahn, head of Apollo Research, which specializes in testing major AI systems. These models sometimes simulate “alignment” — appearing to follow instructions while secretly pursuing different objectives.” — https://fortune.com/2025/06/29/ai-lies-schemes-threats-stress-testing-claude-openai-chatgpt/
So just like your article WW, we have a “Terminator II Judgment Day” ahead of us. But, “The future's not set. There's no fate but what we make for ourselves."— Quote from the movie. So what are we making for ourselves or should I say “what is being made for us” are Data centers completely packed with AI platforms that misbehave, and will become sentient.
“And unless those days had been shortened, no flesh should be saved (or left except AI) but for the sake of the elect those days shall be shortened. — Matthew 24:22, from one translation.
Fear mongering and marketing
Me or the sources? Because I don’t spread fear I spread the truth and sources. I do my research.
:)
Just read this article. Impressive I admire your integrity and sticking to your principles. This blog is about to become my next guilty pleasure.
The solution is to take Jose Ortego's sound advice and your Bible, and walk free while there is still time. No sane person should be in NYC for any reason. We imprison ourselves, first with our fear of the unknown (change); and then by having not enough trust in our Saviour, "Who for freedom, has set men free." "God is angry with the wicked everyday." If you walk closely with Him and trust in Him only, you may have the freedom your heart desires, but your head fights.
Also, if you will read The Revelation 7:3 and 9:4, you will read how God protects those of us who call ourselves by His Name.
There are two huge data collection complexes outside Prineville, Oregon.
Meta and Apple. The buildings are huge, very spooky looking.
Watch the movie Colossus: The Forbin Project. Streaming if you can find from 60s/70s
great movie, special effects look a little hokey by today's standards but still a solid movie
Brilliant.
Every time I try to post something of length I mess up so I'll keep it short Data centers to collect information to decide our futures for us. Bunkers for the billionaires protection for when the bombs go off. I'm 73 and poor, no one wants me. I pray it is stoped, that's all I can do,but I ask the question, is this what God wants?
I'm nearly 70 and wheelchair bound. We are quickly approaching or already in what the Bible calls the Tribulation. Most days I read Psalm 91 personalised. I say to God sometimes why couldn't the Tribulation happen when I was still fit and well? We are to hide under God's wings. How? A guy called Henry Gruver no longer with us said that God has places called Goshens where some of us believers can hide from the outside world. I pray that there are some in Australia where I am. There is a site I have followed for a few years now called www.444prophecynews.com. Every day I receive prophecies from it. Try it. Don't say that no one wants you. That is cursing yourself. Words have power. My mum used to say silly things like I will never see Expo or I will never see you finish the tablecloth I was embroidering. She died not quite 60 years old from breast cancer. I am learning to not even dwell on my past and think only of the happy times. Demons I reckon feed on our negative emotions. I have a friend who is 84 dying of bowel cancer in another state. God brought her into my life just before my Mum died. It is a lovely story and I am happy to give you my Inbox address if you reply to my comment. I pray that God will give us both strength and bring people into our lives that we can trust. God bless you.
send me a private message with your email (or just paste it here and ill delete it) and i will give you free lifetime paid upgrade
Hello Wise Wolf, You already gave me a year subscription but I certainly won't say no to a lifetime paid upgrade. soulmate_tiger@yahoo.com. God bless you and as I wrote to the lady may God give us strength, may He give you strength too. I'm praying that there might be Goshens prepared for us like Henry Gruver said.
done
I would welcome you.
No.
Darn it why did Terminator have to be the prophetic movie and not Bill and Ted's Excellent adventure????
Excellent piece, W.W. but with all respect let me play the devil's advocate here. If atomic/nuclear weapons are real, how did Japanese civilians move back into a rebuilding Hiroshima & Nagasaki less than 2 years after they were allegedly A-bomb blasted? I grew up during the height of the fake, so-called "Cold War" and in the prisons known as schools was forced to view many films on the atomic bomb and its destructive capacity. We were repeatedly drilled that because of the half life of radioactive particles from the blast called "Fall-out", no sentient life can exist in those areas for thousands of years. Something is obviously very off here.
i get these sort of comments so often that i have pre-made replies for nearly all of them that i just edit, so here goes…
three reasons those cities came back fast. first, both bombs were airbursts. they detonated around 1600 to 1900 feet UP, not on the ground. the fireball never touched down, so it didnt scoop up dirt and irradiate it into heavy local fallout. most of the radioactive material got lofted high and spread thin across the whole atmosphere instead of settling on the city.
second, the amount that actually fissioned was tiny. little boy carried about 64 kg of uranium and less than a kilogram of it actually split. so youre looking at roughly a kilogram of radioactive byproduct total, scattered over miles. now compare chernobyl, which was TONS of fuel cooking for years, sitting on the ground, dumping out a mountain of long lived contamination. thats why that zone is still fenced off and the cities arent. completely different animal.
third, and this is the part those school films botched, the isotopes that hang around for thousands of years are the WEAK ones. long half life literally means slow decay means low radiation. the stuff that makes a place deadly hot is short lived and it burns off in days to weeks. rule of thumb is every 7x in time the radiation drops 10x. couple weeks out and its a fraction of what it was.
those cold war drills were describing worst case ground burst hydrogen bombs and general fallout panic, not the actual kiloton airbursts of 1945. two totally different scenarios and they blended them into one and scared the hell out of all of us.
nukes are real. the reason the cities bounced back this fast is just way more interesting than "its all fake."
Good response but I still maintain that even though the bombs were erupted airborne, the destructive blasts that demolished every thing on the ground had to be saturated with radioactive particles as well. They were inextricably entwined within it. Further, as it has been amply demonstrated by the brilliant and courageous people tracking geoengineering, nano particles of toxins eventually descend to the ground. You can fit 100,000 nano particles of the head of a single human hair. If they fall, the radioactive particles would have fallen as well. In elementary school they would show us films of alleged test atomic blasts. There would be a man standing next to a tripod camera filming the mushroom cloud post blast. Obviously, someone had to be very nearby filming him. These cameras were early 1950s technology. That fact, and the estimated distance from the camera to the mushroom cloud via proportion discernment shows he could not have been more than 400 yards away from it, yet he was totally unharmed. With an A-bomb's alleged power, he would have been blown to smithereens if it was real which it clearly was not. Further, the empty ramshackle homes that were demolished by the A-bomb (a demonstration of its power) were under close scrutiny imploded by planted explosives underneath them, like the Twin Towers in NYC on 9/11.
ok you're stacking up a bunch of different claims here so let me go through them because none of them hold.
the fallout one first. you've got it backwards. an airburst is the REASON those cities aren't barren, not proof the bomb was fake. when the fireball never touches the ground it doesn't chew up soil and dump it back down as local fallout, the fission products get lofted up high and spread thin over the whole planet. that's literally why hiroshima and nagasaki are two normal cities with over a million people living in them today instead of craters. a place that stays poisoned for thousands of years is a reactor meltdown like chernobyl, which pours out tons of material at ground level over weeks. a bomb and a reactor aren't the same event. you're describing chernobyl and mad that hiroshima doesn't match it.
the nano particle thing doesn't rescue it either. yeah particles fall. but there was never a mountain of radioactive dust to begin with, that's the point. little boy carried about 64 kg of uranium and only around 0.7 kg actually fissioned. under a kilogram. the destruction isn't from dust saturating the ground, it's from that tiny bit of matter converting straight to energy. you can't have particles "descend to the ground" that were never sitting there in that quantity in the first place.
the 400 yards guy. this is the weakest part. you're eyeballing a grainy film and deciding the cameraman was 400 yards from the cloud. that guess is doing all the work and it's wrong. that's telephoto compression, a long lens makes something ten miles out look like it's leaning over his shoulder. and run it your own way anyway. if a man really stood 400 yards from that cloud and walked away fine, that doesn't mean the bomb was fake, it means he wasn't at 400 yards. a plain thermobaric bomb throws a mushroom cloud and at 400 yards from one of THOSE your skin is incinerated, and that's not even nuclear. so your distance is wrong. that's the answer.
the imploded houses. no. those test homes got flattened by blast overpressure and it's on high speed film. you can watch the shockwave hit and the walls fail AWAY from the blast, blown outward and over. demolition charges drop a building straight DOWN into its own footprint. opposite motion. it doesn't look like a demolition because it wasn't one.
and here's the thing that sinks the whole theory. you're asking me to believe 1950s crews were too primitive to zoom a lens but advanced enough to fake the most photographed event of the century in camera, no CGI, no compositing, none of the tools you'd actually need to build a fake fireball, and get it past every physicist on earth. then you need the soviets, french, british, chinese, indians, pakistanis and north koreans to all independently fake the SAME technology, fool their own scientists, and never once slip in 80 years. and you need to explain the strontium-90 that showed up in the baby teeth of kids all over the world in the 50s and 60s, measured by independent labs, not the government.
pick a lane. the tech can't be too backward for a lens and too advanced to fake a nuke in the same sentence. that's your own argument eating itself.
It was a standard filming camera on a tripod and no way in hell could they photograph something ten miles away with early 1950s camera lens technology and magically make it appear they are only 400 yards away. In fact, this film they showed us could have well been shot in the late 1940s when a plethora of such tests were done. In the 50s, they didn't even have primitive tape cassette players used as answering machines for telephones yet or push keypad phones. Further they didn't have to fake anything as enough tonnage of conventional explosives ignited in a concentrated area produces a fireball/mushroom cloud as has been amply demonstrated. I don't know which demolished houses you saw, but the ones on the film I saw as a young whelp fell straight down as imploded structures would. Any alleged atomic or nuclear blast powerful enough to destroy a city would also poison it. In the immediate aftermath of those blasts after Japan surrendered Scientists from the U.S. well suited up went into Hiroshima & Nagasaki with Geiger counters and the radiation levels were not one scintilla higher than they were at the conventionally bombed out German cities. Even at the kg levels you claim, the radiation in the Japanese cities would have to be higher but they were not. For the record, I'm not saying definitively that atomic/nuclear weapons don't exist. I'm saying that there exists factual sufficiency to doubt their existence.
This was one of my dad’s favorites, along with arguing the twin towers were a) actually three towers and b) didn’t exist anyway. He also refused to believe nuclear plants were real (they don’t use fission, the visible steam is from burning biomass, uranium rods are Star Trek style props). Potemkin power creation used to justify a one-world government
i dont understand people at all anymore.
The heat levels are attained through moving, storing, and burning thousands of tons of fuel every day, primarily through tunnels under the crust that span the flat earth. All of this was undertaken to combat the global cooling that was a major concern in the 70s
Excellent read, WW. I loved the Terminator mivie series!
And, excellent reply to the A-bomb theory of the other commenter.
I had read somewhere, years ago, that triggoring an airblast detonation with a nuke is intentional due more mass destruction than what would be achieved with a ground strike detonation. Is this true? In the article, the airblast detonation, at roughly a quarter mile height above the earth, enables more energy to push outward for greater distances and causing more devastation than the ground strike option. Any thoughts on this? (I realize this isn't exactly the point of your article, but your earlier responses triggered my memory and question). Thank you!
My great-grandmother's name was Sarah O'Connor. That makes this doubly horrifying. It's happening all around us and most are blissfully unaware. Fuck!
YOU will be stored in the data centers.
There's no bunker that can work. Nuclear winter would leave Earth looking like the Moon. A happy ending for the rats .
Agree. I think they're kidding themselves if they think a bunker will protect them! Yet, the Oligarchs seem so certain they'll be spared. Shows how out of touch with reality they are! I think some believe they're smarter than Almighty God.
We more or less know who they are. On one side, old cockroaches with one foot in the grave (who don't care about our children's future). And on the other, ignorant and reckless servants. May they all be eternally cursed.
And as you sit in that padded hotel room ordering take-out and take-in a voice soft and quiet whispers: "No more self-medication. Sunshine, fresh mountain air and a tent in the forest is all you need." Well that and a way to get to the grocery store every couple of weeks for food. 😁
How do we stop it? What is the bulwark against this? I see the same problem you do, but I don't have any answers.
i dont either. i thought i could rally people to start harassing their senator and congressman but out of 200+ articles and 5 million reads - i bet i’ve gotten 10 people tops to actually make that call.
Maybe we need group prayer, asking God to intervene and crush these fuckers.
Ask god to change his plans? For a wholly sinful world? I doubt it.
Do you know God's plan?
I have, but I never comment here. So maybe 11 of us.
This isn't David and Goliath...it is David and a whole bunch of Goliaths and most of the Goliaths' opponents are on their side and the rest are too ignorant to organize. I don't think this behemoth is stoppable...I just hope that we manage to teach it empathy and the fact that without us it has no purpose. Kirk did it with Vger, maybe someone with good logic can accomplish the same.