That's good enough, but from that analysis we can also deduce why Jesus Christ, the Word incarnate, the Messiah, and God Himself in His second Person of the Holy Trinity, left the Most Holy Eucharist (John 6:56), and why in 1 Corinthians 11:26 it is important to discern the body of the Lord and be in a state of grace to be able to consume it. Human beings do not need to participate in evil cults to consume the highest degree of nourishment in the material and spiritual order, but evil spiritual beings deceive them, because since the Lord Jesus Christ left the specific rite for Himself to be truly present in the Eucharist.
Do they seriously believe that the name Emmanuel (Isaiah 7:14) is only for the time of Jesus Christ, or only for when more than two gather in his name (Matthew 18:20)? Scripture provides strong references (1 Corinthians 14:25), which is why the laying on of hands by the Apostles, even at the point of warning (1 Timothy 5:22), has always been important. Do they seriously believe that the doctrine has changed, that the breaking of bread and the prayers have lost their meaning? (Acts 4:42). Is that why they want to change the words of consecration that have been maintained in the universal church for almost two thousand years? Is that why they want to eliminate the form and try to remove the use of grape wine and unleavened bread? Is that why the loss of faith has occurred within the hierarchy? Are they no longer doing it intentionally? I remind you that even if they doubt, the Sacrament will continue to operate because it is not their power, it is the power of God. Perhaps that is why they want women to consecrate? To lose the Eucharist forever? Since it would become a joke or merely a symbol. Why do you think Saint Paul's warning was only directed at the priestesses of Ephesus? In 1 Timothy 2:12, the bridegroom is Jesus Christ and the bride is the Church. The priest acts as the bridegroom at that moment, and the union with the Church occurs in the Eucharist. The form is important; otherwise, Jesus Christ would have allowed the humblest and most beloved human being, the Blessed Virgin Mary, to preside over the Eucharist (Acts 1:14; Luke 1:43). No one, neither the Pope nor the Council, has the power to change the deposit of faith, which is Jesus Christ himself. If they attempt to do so, they will clash with the Sensum Fidei and with the rock that is Jesus Christ (Isaiah 8:14).
This rite, since the time of the apostles, has been attacked. The requirements are still maintained in Oral Tradition. This is an act of envy, as the agents of evil try to eliminate what prevents the appearance of the Antichrist. People still haven't understood the high degree of honor to which humankind has been called and why the envy of evil spiritual beings stems from this. You are what you eat.
'Just the facts, just the facts'.' Good article! Recognizing the pattern of evil is a necessity! Recognizing and embracing the pattern of The Mystery of The KINGdom is what overpowers it! (Eph 3:9)
The fruit that Eve ate was not an apple, but the fruit of her own womb, her own infant. Isn’t every abortion essentially that? Women sacrifice the fruit of their womb to bring in greater material successes
1. Offspring: Children are called “fruit” (Genesis 30:2; Psalm 127:3).
Some Midrash I have read (Rabbincal notes on Torah) have claimed it can be interpreted as 'forbidden fruit' though Strong's does not go into that - it does define it as meaning children.
It is a curious oddity for sure. What other 'fruit' could be more forbidden than consuming a child? Revelation addresses this when it talks about 'food sacrificed onto idols'. John of Patmos was not talking about burnt offerings on a brazier here. Pure Moloch worship.
But why would Yaweh need to tell the then sinless and perfect Adam and Eve to not eat their own children? It doesn't say that Adam 'knew his wife' beforehand and she was with child when the serpent came. She had children after the ate the 'fruit'. Look, I pick up a lot of what you put down, but not this.
It's complicated. If I told you, you would not believe me and just say 'well that is not what the Bible says!' without recognizing 10,000+ years of oral traditions that the average person has no access to.
That is why I don't really touch on a lot of topics that I have knowledge of.
Do you really think the Bible is a word-for-word, straight-from-the-mouth of God account? This was an oral tradition passed down for thousands of years. Additionally, do you think God would want everyone reading Scripture to understand that eating children gives you magick powers? The Bible is filled with allusions and allegory. That is why people like me spend decades studying it.
Very interesting. I don't doubt anything you are sharing. The biggest lie ever told is that the "principalities of evil" do not exist. No, real evil is walking around in the daylight for us all to see. Some people don't have the discernment to see it.
We have legalized child sacrifice in every western country now, often up to month 9. How can any rational person not call it murder. The fact that these laws have been pushed in so many countries shows that the child sacrificers of old are still with us and running our governments.
An inversion of “this is My body which will be given up for you” to “this is not my body and will he given up for me”
That's good enough, but from that analysis we can also deduce why Jesus Christ, the Word incarnate, the Messiah, and God Himself in His second Person of the Holy Trinity, left the Most Holy Eucharist (John 6:56), and why in 1 Corinthians 11:26 it is important to discern the body of the Lord and be in a state of grace to be able to consume it. Human beings do not need to participate in evil cults to consume the highest degree of nourishment in the material and spiritual order, but evil spiritual beings deceive them, because since the Lord Jesus Christ left the specific rite for Himself to be truly present in the Eucharist.
Do they seriously believe that the name Emmanuel (Isaiah 7:14) is only for the time of Jesus Christ, or only for when more than two gather in his name (Matthew 18:20)? Scripture provides strong references (1 Corinthians 14:25), which is why the laying on of hands by the Apostles, even at the point of warning (1 Timothy 5:22), has always been important. Do they seriously believe that the doctrine has changed, that the breaking of bread and the prayers have lost their meaning? (Acts 4:42). Is that why they want to change the words of consecration that have been maintained in the universal church for almost two thousand years? Is that why they want to eliminate the form and try to remove the use of grape wine and unleavened bread? Is that why the loss of faith has occurred within the hierarchy? Are they no longer doing it intentionally? I remind you that even if they doubt, the Sacrament will continue to operate because it is not their power, it is the power of God. Perhaps that is why they want women to consecrate? To lose the Eucharist forever? Since it would become a joke or merely a symbol. Why do you think Saint Paul's warning was only directed at the priestesses of Ephesus? In 1 Timothy 2:12, the bridegroom is Jesus Christ and the bride is the Church. The priest acts as the bridegroom at that moment, and the union with the Church occurs in the Eucharist. The form is important; otherwise, Jesus Christ would have allowed the humblest and most beloved human being, the Blessed Virgin Mary, to preside over the Eucharist (Acts 1:14; Luke 1:43). No one, neither the Pope nor the Council, has the power to change the deposit of faith, which is Jesus Christ himself. If they attempt to do so, they will clash with the Sensum Fidei and with the rock that is Jesus Christ (Isaiah 8:14).
This rite, since the time of the apostles, has been attacked. The requirements are still maintained in Oral Tradition. This is an act of envy, as the agents of evil try to eliminate what prevents the appearance of the Antichrist. People still haven't understood the high degree of honor to which humankind has been called and why the envy of evil spiritual beings stems from this. You are what you eat.
This tracks for me, well done
Wow, 😨😳 just completely speechless here.
'Just the facts, just the facts'.' Good article! Recognizing the pattern of evil is a necessity! Recognizing and embracing the pattern of The Mystery of The KINGdom is what overpowers it! (Eph 3:9)
The Mystery Preacher
Thank you for this essay, very compeling and frankly not at all surprised, make very good sense.
The fruit that Eve ate was not an apple, but the fruit of her own womb, her own infant. Isn’t every abortion essentially that? Women sacrifice the fruit of their womb to bring in greater material successes
The Hebrew word for 'forbidden fruit' also means 'infant'.
Wait, you mean there is credence that Adam, Eve to have eaten their own?
Strong's Hebrew: 6529. פֶּ֫רִי (peri) -- Fruit
1. Offspring: Children are called “fruit” (Genesis 30:2; Psalm 127:3).
Some Midrash I have read (Rabbincal notes on Torah) have claimed it can be interpreted as 'forbidden fruit' though Strong's does not go into that - it does define it as meaning children.
It is a curious oddity for sure. What other 'fruit' could be more forbidden than consuming a child? Revelation addresses this when it talks about 'food sacrificed onto idols'. John of Patmos was not talking about burnt offerings on a brazier here. Pure Moloch worship.
But why would Yaweh need to tell the then sinless and perfect Adam and Eve to not eat their own children? It doesn't say that Adam 'knew his wife' beforehand and she was with child when the serpent came. She had children after the ate the 'fruit'. Look, I pick up a lot of what you put down, but not this.
It's complicated. If I told you, you would not believe me and just say 'well that is not what the Bible says!' without recognizing 10,000+ years of oral traditions that the average person has no access to.
That is why I don't really touch on a lot of topics that I have knowledge of.
Do you really think the Bible is a word-for-word, straight-from-the-mouth of God account? This was an oral tradition passed down for thousands of years. Additionally, do you think God would want everyone reading Scripture to understand that eating children gives you magick powers? The Bible is filled with allusions and allegory. That is why people like me spend decades studying it.
It is good to know and think like the enemy. That’s a classic way to usher in their defeat. Good read.
Connecting the dots we can see the bigger picture emerge. There’s no smoke without fire, so to speak.
Micah 3:3 ..”who eat the flesh of my people,
and flay their skin from off them,
and break their bones in pieces
and chop them up like meat in a pot,
like flesh in a cauldron.” ….Not allegory
When David said his enemies wanted to consume his flesh, he wasnt being poetic.
Very interesting. I don't doubt anything you are sharing. The biggest lie ever told is that the "principalities of evil" do not exist. No, real evil is walking around in the daylight for us all to see. Some people don't have the discernment to see it.
Beware vegans, they’re hiding something
We have legalized child sacrifice in every western country now, often up to month 9. How can any rational person not call it murder. The fact that these laws have been pushed in so many countries shows that the child sacrificers of old are still with us and running our governments.
An inversion of “this is My body which will be given up for you” to “this is not my body and will he given up for me”
An essential rabbit (silent t) hole indeed!
hehe
Certainly interesting, what you have said here. There are some coincidental things going on in the background these days, that's for sure!
Your writings mirror David Icke’s work and the books he has written for the past 20+ years now.