Investigative YouTuber Voidzilla, with over a million subscribers, has done what mainstream media refused to do: hire a professional 3D modeling company to recreate Jeffrey Epstein's prison and analyze the government's claims about his death. The results are damning.
Working with experts, Voidzilla painstakingly recreated the Metropolitan Correctional Center's Special Housing Unit based on government-provided photos and measurements. This isn't some amateur conspiracy video - this is professional forensic analysis that exposes five major lies federal officials have told the American people.
Don't believe us? Watch the video above.
When FBI Directors Lie to Your Face, What Are They Hiding?
How many times can federal officials get caught in outright lies before we start asking the obvious questions? A professional 3D reconstruction of Jeffrey Epstein's prison has exposed five major falsehoods told by the FBI and Department of Justice. The question isn't whether these are lies anymore - the evidence proves they are. The question is: why are they lying?
Why Would FBI Director Kash Patel Show Us the Wrong Cell?
When the FBI Director tells you he's showing you footage of Jeffrey Epstein's cell, you'd expect to see Jeffrey Epstein's cell, right? Wrong. The 3D analysis proves the footage Patel claimed showed "Epstein's cell" was actually a completely different cell.
See it for yourself at 0:18 in the video above. Watch as Voidzilla flies through the 3D model to Epstein's actual cell location, marked with a green door, proving the footage we were shown isn't even the right cell.
So the obvious question is: if this is just a simple mistake, why hasn't it been corrected? And if it's not a mistake, why is the FBI Director deliberately showing Americans the wrong footage and calling it evidence?
How Do You "Accidentally" Forget About 10 Other Cameras?
Deputy FBI Director Paul Abbate looked the public in the eye and said there was "only one camera" in the entire housing unit. But government records show there were actually 11 cameras. That's not a rounding error - that's either complete incompetence or a deliberate lie.
Don't believe the FBI lied about the cameras? Listen to Deputy Director Dan Bongino yourself at 0:39 in the video above. Then watch at 0:48 as Voidzilla shows you the 3D model with all the camera locations marked - proving there were 11 cameras, not one.
Here's what should terrify you: nine of those cameras were working perfectly fine until just days before Epstein died. Then they mysteriously "malfunctioned" and stopped recording. What are the odds of that? Nine cameras that worked fine during Epstein's previous incident suddenly break right before he dies?
Ask yourself: if your job was to make sure someone couldn't be silenced, wouldn't disabling the cameras be step one?
If There's "Nobody There But Epstein," Who's Walking Up Those Stairs?
Federal officials repeatedly told us the footage proves "there's no one there but him." They said there are "no suspects, no accomplices" and "nothing" to suggest anyone else was involved.
Think we're making this up? Watch officials say exactly this at 2:01 in the video. "There's just nobody there... There's no DNA. There's no audio. There's no fingerprints. There's no suspects. There's no accomplices."
But their own footage shows multiple people present that night. At 10:38 PM - after lockdown - someone walks up the stairs. The government can't even agree on who this person is or what they were doing. First they said "laundry," then "bedding or clothing," then "probably Noel."
Don't take our word for it - see the mysterious figure yourself at 2:46 in the video above. Watch it zoomed in and in slow motion. Even video forensic experts couldn't definitively identify what they were seeing.
If this footage proves nobody was there but Epstein, who is that person walking up the stairs after the facility was locked down? Why can't federal investigators identify someone in their own prison? And why are they pretending this person doesn't exist when we can all see them in the footage?
Why Promise "Raw Footage" Then Give Us Edited Videos?
This is where the lies become impossible to explain away. Federal officials specifically promised to give us both enhanced and original footage. They said they wanted to prove there were "no shenanigans."
Instead, they gave us two videos that were both edited in Adobe Premiere Pro. Three minutes are missing. Forensic experts say the footage "wouldn't stand up in court."
So here's the million-dollar question: if you have nothing to hide, why edit the footage? If you want to prove there were "no shenanigans," why engage in shenanigans? And if you have the raw footage (which government sources admit they do), why won't you release it?
How Can One Camera "See Everything" When It Obviously Can't?
The Department of Justice's entire case rests on one claim: that their camera captured anyone who could have accessed Epstein's cell. They wrote in an official memo that "anyone entering or attempting to enter the tier where Epstein cell was located would have been captured by this footage."
The 3D reconstruction proves this is false. There are massive blind spots. Someone can walk up the right side of the staircase completely invisible to the camera. The government already admitted this years ago, calling it a "partial view" of the stairway.
So why are they now claiming it shows everything when they previously admitted it doesn't? How can the foundation of their entire case be something they know is false?
What Happens When Guards "Fall Asleep" on the Most Important Night?
The two guards responsible for watching Epstein that night were later charged with falsifying records. Instead of doing mandatory 30-minute wellness checks, they fell asleep and browsed the internet. One guard was literally reading news articles about Jeffrey Epstein instead of watching Jeffrey Epstein.
This wasn't just negligence - it was criminal negligence so severe they were federally prosecuted for it. These guards eliminated the only human oversight of Epstein during the critical hours.
Ask yourself: what are the odds that the cameras malfunction AND the guards fall asleep on the same night? How many coincidences do you need before you start asking if they're actually coincidences?
Why Are We Accepting This Level of "Incompetence"?
Let's say, for argument's sake, that every single one of these failures was just incompetence:
The FBI Director accidentally showed the wrong cell
10 cameras were "forgotten" about
Nine cameras mysteriously malfunctioned days before Epstein's death
Guards fell asleep during the most important watch in federal prison history
Evidence was accidentally destroyed or lost
Footage was accidentally edited despite promises of raw video
Officials accidentally lied about camera coverage capabilities
Even if all of this was just stunning incompetence, wouldn't that be almost as bad as a cover-up? Are we supposed to trust institutions that are either this corrupt or this incompetent?
What Does This Say About Every Other Case?
If federal law enforcement agencies are willing to lie this blatantly about evidence in the most high-profile case in decades - a case the entire world is watching - what does that tell you about cases nobody's paying attention to?
If they'll edit footage and lie about it in a case where they know they'll be scrutinized, what are they doing in cases where they think nobody's looking?
The Real Question: Who Are They Protecting?
The evidence is clear: federal officials have lied repeatedly about basic, verifiable facts. They've provided edited footage while promising raw video. They've claimed comprehensive surveillance while knowing about blind spots. They've minimized the number of cameras and ignored the presence of other people.
This isn't a conspiracy theory - this is documented deception using their own evidence.
So the question every American should be asking is simple: what exactly are they trying so hard to hide?
Because whatever it is, they're willing to lie to your face to protect it.
